Jump to content

Recommended Posts

i was born in 1964 and i was brought home from hospital to number 3 matham grove i was raised by my grandparents and we lived there till i was 14. when i was about 8 i started exploring the house and at the top of the stairs near the attic there was a closet we had filled it with junk but when i looked closer it had little stickers on each shelf saying 'boys white vests' and 'boys white pants' hmmm i was intrigued on further inspection i noticed that in the hallway by the front door and on the landing at the bottom of the last set of stairs there was like a hard board seperating number 1 from number 3. now i was told by the old lady who lived downstairs fom us that the two houses had been conjoined and it was a boys home run by nuns please if anyone could tell me if the story is true i've always wondered Ann Bailey was Rodriguez
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15718-the-history-of-matham-grove/
Share on other sites

I looked up the census returns for you - in 1891 it was a single family home. In 1901 it was a Camberwell Board of Guardians Home. There were 11 children, boys and girls, and one foster mother. In 1911 there were 24 children, boys and girls, and two foster mothers. The age range of the children were from 5 - 14.

In 1911 there was no number 1 - they were listed as 3 and 3.


Hope this helps!


Edited for clarity

Matham Grove was part of the "Bailey Estate". The freehold of the land was owned by E.Bailey of Lordship Lane.


The estate comprised of:


The South side of East Dulwich Grove between Tell Grove and Lordship Lane

The East leg of Tell Grove

Matham Grove

Ashbourne Grove

Both sides of Melbourne Grove between Ashbourne Grove and Chesterfield Grove

Chestefield Grove

Bassano Street

Blackwater Street

The North side of Melbourne Grove between Blackwater Street and Lordship Lane

The West side of Lordship Lane between East Dulwich Grove and Melbourne Grove


Bailey's houses were built between 1873 and 1885 and were built to rent out to the respectable working class. By 1885 a seven room house was rented out at ?30 per year.


John K

It appears to have been what was known as a 'Scattered Home', a Poor Law provision. The London Metropolitan Archives in Clerkenwell have some Camberwell Board of Guardians records, some specific to Matham Grove. If you go here, enter as a guest, and then search on Matham, you can see catalogue entries for the admission and discharge register. There appears to have been a home in Melbourne Grove too, which might have been the predecessor of the Matham Grove one. London County Council would have assumed responsibility when the Local Government Act 1929 abolished the poor law unions. The LMA also has many LCC records.

Hi Ann


I've been into both 1 and 3 Matham Grove and seen that door between the two houses. Like you, I immediately wanted to know why it was there :-) It was boarded over and plastered many years ago when the house was refurbished as two flats.

Look here for a little more information :- http://www.workhouses.org.uk/index.html?Camberwell/Camberwell.shtml

You'll need to scroll down to the 3rd picture from the bottom to see another pair of 'joined' houses in the street.

oh my god that pic in 1899 is my street not a lot has changed from the outside of the houses i was allowed in most of the houses as a child but i never went in 9 or 11 so i never knew there was another house like mine absolutly fascinating, thank you so much for guiding me to this website. Ann

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not really since the first world war, and mainly in the sense then of 'getting a Blighty one' meaning a wound so serious you had to be sent home. I seriously doubt if one school child in 100 now would know what Blighty meant if the word was presented on its own with no context. 
    • 1 space available due to one of my clients moving.  Message me for more informations  🙂  
    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...