Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think you should change your OP to 'what makes northerners so jealous of southerners'.


I'll get you started.


The majority of northerners have an iron lung, whereas in the south, respiratory health is much better.


Northerners get confused by the many Gods they whorship, whereas in the south they only have one.


The north of England still suffers from the occassional outbreak of bubonic plague, whereas down south you only get the odd spot of hayfever.


A northerner's IQ rarely rises above room temperature, whereas we're hella smart down he'ah!


Northern healthcare is limited to the county vet, whereas down south we have hospitals funded by the taxpayer.


It's gloomy all year round in the land of the savages, whereas down south you can fry an egg on your toilet seat during the height of summer.

Ah, now I get it. You're talking about the vulgar, working-class verb for boffing. And please, allow me to assure you that I'm no 'stock character'. I'm a living, breathing person. But worry not, RosieH. You're sure to find plenty of 'characters' in the network of subterranean dwellings of the north of England. I've even heard that Ena Sharples' ghost can be heard roaming (and moaning) the passages that are home to so many below the Pennines.
Oh, also, that when southerners say @#$%&, it sounds retarded. Whereas when northerners say it, it sounds good and proper. Anglo Saxon vowels are where it's at.


Assuing you mean cunt (beginning with a c), I used to have a girlfriend from North Yorks, and she said that us southerners said it much better, because we could sort of spit the word out, with a lot of c.



Really? Because in my experience there doesn't seem to be much difference in the way that northerners and southerners pronounce charity. But yes, I can see why you may think otherise, insofar as northeners are more familiar with that word than us well-fed s**********.



The original noun - that's frequently been altered over time - for the offensive term that references the female vagina was actually brought to our shores by the Romans. In fact, the classical writer Tacitus briefly mentions an occasion in the annals of his Bello Britannia, when General Plautius addressed king Verica, husband of the client queen, Cartimandua of the Brigantes, whilst he was stalling when questioned over the whereabouts of the rebel king Caratacus.


Historians can't tell us exactly what was said between the irritated Roman officer and the Briganteen king, due to the original text being lost, but the academic consensus is that the exchange went along the lines of 'Verica, are you tryin' to take me for a c_nt? Because if you are, then my torture detachment's gonna come in 'ere an' cut your f_ckin' jacobs orf, my son!' Tacitus then wrote that Plautius stormed-off in frustration, but could quite clearly be heard bellowing "c_nts" as he walked towards his camp.


So there you have it.

Plautius should have asked the fascinating witches who put the scintilating stiches in the britches of the boys who put the powder on the noses on the faces of the ladies of the harem of the court of King Caractacus, who had just passed by.

I didn?t realise Colchester was in Kent. You learn something new every day.


The Romans attacked the city with elephants.


You are no longer allowed to attack the local population of Colchester with elephants. This is a good example of political correctness gone mad in the modern world.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...