Jump to content

Recommended Posts

buggie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> I find it especially surprising to see that some

> who worry about giving the regular immunisations

> are then seeming happy to consider giving/give

> their child this.


For the sake of argument this statement could also be turned on its head to read...


It is equally surprising that some who don't worry about giving the regular immunisations are then seemingly against considering giving the chickenpox vaccine.

buggie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just to reassure, I've never seen babies in A&E

> with complications from chickenpox, I've heard if

> mums being keen fir them to have it early as they

> don't scratch as much = less scarring.


Very sorry to say that my MIL's friend lost her baby at 6 days old due to exposure to chickenpox virus. This was some time ago, about 15 years. Perhaps there are better antibody treatments now.


> Still unsure about the reasoning behind national

> immunisation campaigns in the countries

> mentioned... Could understand it being beneficial

> once teenage/adult if not had chickenpox as it

> does seem to affect adults more, but not seen

> anything to convince me yet.


The benefit would be not just to the potentially infected individuals, but also consider the loss in terms of people taking days off work sick or to care for sick children, passing the virus on to vulnerable individuals, etc.


I was slightly shocked recently by the behaviour of a friend of mine. Her 2 yo daughter had been sent home from nursery for several days b/c of chickenpox infection. Instead of keeping her at home to minimise the spread, my friend was taking her out to playgroups and local playgrounds.

Fuschia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The chickenpox vaccine is not part of the UK

> childhood vaccination programme, because experts

> think that introducing a chickenpox vaccination

> for children could increase the risk of shingles

> in older people"


I found the title of this article very misleading. After looking at the research myself, it seems that the most beneficial route would be to vaccinate both young people and the 'elderly', as (re)immunisation with the jab, is now thought to diminish the emergence of varicella virus as shingles.


After looking into the research, here's what else I found:


- Immunisation 3 to 5 days post-exposure can result in a 70-90% reduction in the likelihood of the exposed individual developing chickenpox


- Immunisation with a booster 6 wks to 6 mos afterwards results in greater than 90% immunity for 10 to 20 years, so another booster in the teen years would be advisable.


- About 1 in 100 children under 16 with chickenpox will develop severe complications, and a few of those children will die.


- Younger children do appear to be less affected by chickenpox symptoms than older children, but no one really knows what the 'cut off' age is. The benefit of offering the vaccine to young children would be to give them immunity well before they reach an age where symptoms could become profound.


MediCentre at Victoria Station offers chickenpox jabs for babies over 1 year old. The cost is ?73, with a booster at 6 weeks. An appointment is advisable to minimise waiting.

Really sorry to hear of your friends loss Saffron - having dealt with infant deaths in A&E it is by no means something I take lightly.


I agree my statement can be reversed as well, and having opened up the discussion it has made me consider my own thoughts on immunisations.


Think it all comes down to your own perspective/experiences. Having nursed though the low uptake of the MMR I have seen lots of bad cases of measles, babies being admitted for treatment and needing high levels of care. In the same time (and with I'd guess below 5% of children immunised against it) I've seen < 5 children with severe symptoms of chickenpox (normally badly infected pox and a couple of pneumonia's) all of which were treated and recovered well.


While understanding the difficulties faced by working parents (my mat leave is whizzing by at a rate of knots!) I have an uneasy feeling about immunising to prevent needing to take time off work/use holiday to care for sick children - we already see lots of cases in A&E where parents get a call from school saying their child is sick and head straight to us (occasionally stopping for McDonalds on the way - I wish I was joking) expecting us to have some sort of magic medicine to cure gastroenteritis/tonsillitis/cold or flu... when told it will take 24/48hrs and they shouldn't return to nursery/school/other contact with children until the symptoms have resolved we're looked at with horror as if caring for a sick child was a point snuck into their parenting contract in the v v small print at the bottom of the form, which when I've helped families living with a child with cancer or even life long conditions such as cystic fibrosis or sickle cell makes me feel a bit churlish.


I'm guessing for most of these parents it is due to them for whatever reason not being in jobs that enable them to take adequate carers leave/be in such low paid work or on agency contract whereby no sick/carers leave is paid, if this is the case, is an immunisation really the answer - or should there be more pressure on employers to offer proper paid carers leave for parents (Dad's as well as Mum's).


My worry is that if it is seen that parents would rather look to prevent their children ever becoming ill, then it would be claimed that this sort of provision isn't wanted and so would slip further down the political agenda. No matter how many immunisations are offered, children will become ill at some point or another, chickenpox isn't the worst that can happen by a long stretch.

cactus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm tempted to have my 6 year old vaccinated, he's

> been exposed to

> chickenpox on at least three occasions but has

> never caught it, unless he had such a mild dose

> that none of us noticed!


My understanding of chicken pox is that a significant proportion of the population has natural immunity to it. Therefore if your son has had 3 exposures to it already with no reaction then he may be naturally immune.


Also it is very easy to miss very mild cases eg my son came down with 2 spots only.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 1 space available due to one of my clients moving.  Message me for more informations  🙂  
    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
    • That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’.        Brexit happened Sue.  Boring graphs!  Calling Nigel Farage a plastic patriot is also very insulting seeing as he and the Reform Party have had a landslide victory all over England.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...