Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I got some bloods done on Jan 14th. I called the surgery after a week to be told the results weren't back. I called them the following week to be told they still weren't back, at which point I quipped 'let's hope there's nothing wrong then' and was told that if the bloods showed a problem, the hospital usually returned them in a couple of days. I called one more time to be told the doctor now had them and that I would be called if there was an issue. She took my mobile number so I thought I'd get a phone call. As it happens, I made an appointment the same time about something else for which I had to wait a couple of weeks. I wasn't called back about my blood results so assumed all was fine. Finally, last Tuesday I went to my appointment and it was only as I stood up to leave that I remembered to ask about the bloods. My thyroid levels were in the hyperthyroid range, most likely due to over medication.

The doctor asked if I'd had a letter. No I hadn't, I'd heard nothing from them. Instead, I'd continued to over-medicate unawares a further 5 weeks so god knows what my thyroid levels were at the time I was sitting there face to face with her. As far as I can see, had I not asked about the results at that appointment, I'd still be none the wiser and thinking I was going nuts. Surely this isn't acceptable and they had a duty to inform me sooner?

I think you're right to feel let down and want an explanation; that must have been a worrying situation for you.


If you haven't tried it already, perhaps you could speak to the practice manager to let them know that you're not happy with this and see how they respond? If you get the brush-off, you could send a letter asking them to account for the situation.

Hi Ian - the GP simply asked whether I'd had a letter. When I said no I hadn't, I'm sure she said 'that's bad'. Hell, there was nothing in my notes to alert the GP. I already had a repeat prescription for the medication in my hand which she took back off me once I asked her for the results and she noticed what they said. There was nothing on my mobile either. I just can't believe they can have been so lax.

Tactful comment...


Their process failed them in this case as there were clearly several points where it could have been picked up.


So perhaps that should read: 'Some doctors are occasionally negligent and as a result patients sue them, costing the NHS and hence the tax-payer ridiculous amounts of money'.

Thanks, Mrs B - I do intend to discuss with the Practise Manager as there's evidently a gaping hole in their process which shouldn't be too hard to sort out. However, I'm trying to avoid stressy situations until my feet are back on the ground. Adrenaline, as I found to my cost last week, really seems to escalate the hyper symptoms. As does caffeine - you'd have thought the doctor could have mentioned that one.. But no.


Hi PR: Well, I'm sure I will be alright. I've been rather enjoying having normal energy levels to be honest and being able to do things again. If it weren't for a racing heart, migraines, eye problems and wierdly aching muscles, I'd be happy to keep things at this level - lol..! I think it should all be reversible once the thyroid levels come back down.


I am seriously considering a change of doctor, I know you rate Nunhead Surgery highly and I considered changing a few times before this happened. However, wherever I go needs to be reasonably easy to get to by public transport as I can't always walk far. Chadwick Road was less than ideal from that perspective. I'll check out Nunhead Grove on the map - I don't want to have to be dependent on the unreliable P12 to get me to appts on time..

Thanks for the advice. I called and spoke to the Practise Manager to explain what had happened. She said she'd investigate and apologised for the 'anxiety and stress' this must have caused, which annoyed me so I told her that my concern is whether the heart and muscle issues are going to be reversible or not compared to which anxiety and stress is neither here nor there. Assuming all will be well with me, someone else might not be so fortunate and they really need to plug the hole in their processes which allowed this situation to occur in the first place. I've asked for the results of the investigation in writing. I'm quite good at analysing processes so I'm very interested to see what they have to say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...