Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am about to embark upon a new nanny share from mid March. On a few of the days I will likely need to be involved in a share with another family for their 5 month old.


What is the status quo with the double buggy situation? (my son is 17 months). I know the other family don't have one, and I don't really want to buy one as don't anticipate trying for a second child for a few years, at which point a double buggy won't be needed anyway as our son will be too old.


Anyone know the etiquette on this?

In my experience, it's been very easy to buy and sell second hand buggies on gumtree (and I bet the EDF works well too) so I would perhaps suggest that you go halves on whatever's needed for now, and then you sell it and split the proceeds when it's no longer needed....

We bought a Phil & Teds on the forum and two footmuffs from John lewis. Total cost ?150 which we covered between the two families on the understanding it would be sold at the end of the arrangement. Given the price and condition of the buggy I don't think we will be out of pocket much.


Keep a beedy eye on the forum for people selling and move quickly.

Hi, I bought a Maclaren Twin Rally secondhand for our nanny share. The boys are 2.5 and 3 now so we don't need it anymore. It's yours for 50 quid - including raincover! It's in good condition, feel free to come have a look.

I also have an extra Graco highchair if it's of any interest.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government 
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...