Jump to content

Recommended Posts

TfL have announced where Bus Countdown boards will be placed at bus stops across London.


In SE22, new boards will be placed at both East Dulwich station bus stops and Goodrich Road (in Barry Road), however the Upland Road and Grove Tavern boards in Lordship Lane are not on the list.


The list of board sites are on the TfL website.


http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/Agreed-stop-locations.pdf

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16556-new-bus-countdown-boards-for-ed/
Share on other sites

That is good news. The bus stop at FHR, near to the HH tavern was not displaying info for the 63 when I caught it yesterday lunchtime. On the way back from King's X much later, the info board there for 63 was not showing services either. I told both drivers but I don't think they were too bothered.

The Plough already has two countdown bus stops on the westbound side, outside the library and Plough Homecare. These are the two that are staying. Goose Green already has a board at the stop going towards Camberwell/Peckham.


Also to mention that the current countdown board is going from the North Cross Road bus stop towards Forest Hill.

I was right... and I was wrong.


http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/projectsandschemes/11560.aspx


This year we'll be introducing a new, improved Countdown system for all of London's bus stops via text message and web. A new generation of Countdown signs will also be provided at key bus stops.

Overall the same number of Countdown boards in ED. Where new boards placed old ones will be removed.

Crazy presumption that everyone has a smarthpone and if they do that they want to wave them around to entice muggers.

remote infrequently served bus stops wont have countdown.

Overall spend ?13M.


For that they should have been able to deploy a new countdown at every bus stop in London - which would be a smarthpone in a box with big indicator board using GPRS to keep it updated.

Why are they removing the North Cross Road board?


That's the stop I use when going in the Forest Hill direction, so whilst recognising that I am only one of many people using the buses, that's really really annoying!


It's a request stop, so I rely on the board to know whether I can read my book for a while without having a bus sail by without me :)


What's the point of removing boards, can the system only bear a certain number or something?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why are they removing the North Cross Road board?

>

> That's the stop I use when going in the Forest

> Hill direction, so whilst recognising that I am

> only one of many people using the buses, that's

> really really annoying!

>

> It's a request stop, so I rely on the board to

> know whether I can read my book for a while

> without having a bus sail by without me :)

>

> What's the point of removing boards, can the

> system only bear a certain number or something?


It appears TfL have chosen bus stops with heavy usage, which explains why East Dulwich Station, Goose Green and Dulwich Library have been chosen over North Cross Road, Upland Road or the Grove Tavern.


In Forest Hill for example, the current boards are situated either in Stanstead Road or Waldram Park Road which has two bus routes with not many passengers waiting for buses, but the town centre stops by the station have none. This will change when the new boards are installed.

Bic Basher,


Just tried the link, but don't know how to access the info, so could you tell me please, if there is going to be one at the Peckham Rye/ East Dulwich Rd crossroads.

It's the stop that serves the 197, 63, 363 & 12 heading towards Croydon/Crystal Palace.


Thanks.

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The list shows one of the bus stops there with the

> number 1492 (I think that's the number showed on

> the side of the bus stop) which I suspect is

> replacing the current Countdown board at the stop

> going towards Peckham. (12, 63, 78, 363, P12)



I was at the stop today & the no. is 1493, so hope it will still be included.

Thanks for the info.

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would be good to have one outside the old barracks

> on Lordship Lane (going north into town)


I agree that it would be a sensible pair of stops to have them fitted since there are a number of bus routes that 'cross' there so people switch buses. It's my 'local' stop and quite regularly more people disembark a bus and wait at the bus stop than walk off entirely. The 363 especially won't have a 'countdown' stop in any direction for some way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
    • How long is a piece of string? AI was a bit rubbish on this one, but Checatrade : average cost to paint a house exterior is around £30 per square metre So depends on the size, access, time to put up scaffolding and cost of hiring and building that, surface preparation, and quality of materials.   Checkatrade put it at £2.5 k for average semi, that sounds a little cheap.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...