Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry VillagerId but that's crap, no-one has done anything on the sly, there have been 4 meetings, each attended by about 50 to 60 people who actually bothered to turn up, and express their opinions rather than moan and bitch about it, without actually bothering to turn up.

There's lots about it in this thread here


But mainly it means that the school comes out of Southwark control and becomes a company limited by guarantee and a charity receiving funding directly from the Dept of Ed. The school doesn't have to contribute to the local authority wide fiund to pay for shared services and canchoose what services it opts into. The main financial reason given at the meetings I attended was that there was a short window of opportunity to derive maximum benefit from this non-payment to the council. It is not clear how long the advantage will remain.


In terms of regulation it is no longer inspected by OFSTED and is not subject to normal oversight by the charities commission as it will be an "exempt charity".


There's lots more and, as I said, I think its set out in some detail in the other thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
    • That petition is bananas.   If you want a youth centre there pay the landlord the same rent a Londis would and build it yourself or shut the f**k up to be honest. Wasting our MPs time with this trivial nonsense is appalling. If your kids are still out at 1am on a school night you've got bigger problems than vapes and booze and hot sausage rolls. 
    • There used to be a better baker than Gail's on the same site immediately before Gail's pulled their financial muscle.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...