Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Went the whole baby led weaning route but my little man has decided he most certainly prefers milk to food. Currently 15 months and although will eat a small breakfast & lunch more often than not won't eat dinner. Probably has about 32oz milk a day! Have tried cutting down on the daytime milk but he just has more at bedtime and I give in to that as he's a good sleeper and don't want to ruin that.


Should I be concerned? Any tips to encourage him?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16594-toddler-prefers-milk-to-food/
Share on other sites

Not sure you worrying about it will make much difference. Does he have the milk from a bottle?


I think TOO much milk can affect iron levels but I'm sure his consumption will drop in time. Perhaps for daytime milk you could water it down? When does he have this milk.. before naps, at meal times, constant small drinks? Does he drink water too?

Thanks Fuschia, to be honest up to now I wasn't worrying about it as thought we'd just go with the flow, not make a scene over meal times & he'd drop it when ready (like his morning nap which he can't seem to manage without either...!) But then I heard about the iron concern.


Yep gave up breast feeding when he was 1. His morning & daytime milk is from his NUK beaker but with a teat as he refuses the beaker top! Then his bedtime one is from the bottle. I also tried moving him on to a non spill beaker but he refused that too. He drinks lots of water and will happily take that from his non spill beaker. Milk is first thing at 6.30/7am ish then again at 0930 when he has a 30 minute nap, 1pm ish before his afternoon nap, then 3.30pm and 6.30pm


It's not like he's fussy about certain foods and for example only wants yoghurt as he'll happily turn that down too. He's just not that interested in food full stop.


Mary, Mary quite contrary. :)

Well past one all my (still bf) children fed more often than that and probably as much in quantity. Up to 32oz is recommended for under 1s.


I would try not to stress too much, never serves a purpose. If he has iron rich foods as far from the milk as possible (milk with meals reduces iron absorption, vit C with meals increases it) then you'll be doing your best.


Maybe keep trying to reduce the amount bit by bit... or a change of routine so he doesn't look for the milk at a particular time. I'd guess that bottle at 3.30 is affecting his eating at dinner time.


I doubt you will get mnuch further through the year without it changing. Is he walking? Bet if you start getting him outside in the afternoons over the Summer he will lose interest a bit.


Perhaps get him a new cup with a straw and give him water with an ice cube in, whne it gets warmer. Something else for him to get excited about.

My daughter was always a milk baby. Even at 2 years I was still feeding her as if she was newborn. She absolutely fine, was still growing healthy and everything. She'd snack during the day a bit but usually just pick at meals. We stopped feeding the night before her birthday and the step from so much milk to all food was nonexistent. She didnt even realise she wasn't taking milk but getting everything from food. She eats very well, has finished dinners every night and is generally a lot less fussy with what she will eat. Please don't let it worry you. She will find her own way, just keep offering her nice healthy snacks and interesting dinners. We started teddy bears picnics, I'd make faces on pitta bread with raisins and apple and philidelphia, or spread tomato puree and grate cheese on a pitta and make a little pizza.


Me and all my siblings were never even weaned till we were 1y+ we never actually fully established solids in our diet until we were around 18-24m. I don't think its uncommon in children either. When you think milk is all they know from the beginning until they are sometimes upto a year old. It takes time to encourage toddlers, but you will get there in the end. I assure you. P.S I know its hard but try not to worry too much.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...