Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What a very immature, unfortunate young woman she is.


And she doesn't practice what she preaches:


From the Standard article: 'Her Instagram post came after in an interview with Dazed Digital on what she ?stands for? she said: ?If you want to say something, say it. I think as long as we are kind and gentle to others and, more importantly, ourselves then everything is bless.?'

Ms Foster has many good points but I can sense the not-so-reluctantly felt cushiony sensation she has of being able to write truthfully and reliably about being working class (even educating others about it) on the ur-bourgeois platform of Twitter - a "privilege" she may not recognise.

IlonaM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Her social background (whatever it might be) isn't

> the issue. Her behaviour is.


Well, although I think everyone can agree she's a tosser, her background is relevant in deciding if she's a class-traitor tosser or a snobby tosser.

So how many GCSE's did Hetty get?? Who cares, because clearly she can't spell either based on the image in question, perhaps bunking off school wasn't such a good idea then Hetty?


Is Hetty an artist, more like minging abstract images, you decide?? http://www.hettydouglas.com/good-luck#7


And she's taken down her Instagram page, well their's a surprise, not.

This is the actual comment......it's even worse!


"The artist, originally from Nottingham, went on to claim the workmen in the picture were not the ?large group of guys? she had meant to capture in the image".


So, she took a photo of the wrong people and didn't mean to say it.


You couldn't make it up.


That's not humility, or damage limitation. It's denial.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...