Jump to content

Recommended Posts

How are the staff responsible for the childrens' behaviour? I was in the Science Museum recently and there was a child trying to dismantle the cut-away mini they have on show. One of the other viewers (female) said something to the child (old enough to know better) and the pathetic father had a go at the visitor in front of the child...what is going on? I bet the daddy wouldn't have said anything if it had been a male who spoke to his child.
I went last Saturday - I thought it was amazing. It was timed entry, I didn't think it was too busy, and the range of butterflies was astounding. A couple landed on my little one and it made her day. Thoroughly recommend. Perhaps you were at an unlucky time. I'll go again.

It's made me think that the Horniman is no longer a museum, it's just an indoor playground.

Why not extend the cafe (it's always full) to cover the whole of the ground floor, use most of the basement for a soft play area (keep the aquarium, it's fun for children to scream and hear the echos and bang on the glass to startle the fish) while the top floor could be devoted to just running round and round and shouting.Oh yes, keep the musical tables, it's nice for people to have something to sit and have their lunch (last week)while children randomly hit the buttons.

FFS.


If children aren't taken to museums, galleries etc from an early age, how do you think those places will carry on when the children grow up?


Or if they are taken, but find them totally boring because there is nothing for them to do?


My grandchildren love the Horniman.


If you want to go somewhere where no kids are allowed, maybe go somewhere else?


Or if you don't like the behaviour you see, take it up with the parents?


I have intervened in a screaming match between two kids in the cafe where the younger one was in danger of being pushed out of his high chair and the adult/s with them were nowhere to be seen.


If you do nothing (eg report the butterfly grabbing to staff) how do you think the behaviour of some parents will change?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FFS.

>

> If children aren't taken to museums, galleries etc

> from an early age, how do you think those places

> will carry on when the children grow up?

>

> Or if they are taken, but find them totally boring

> because there is nothing for them to do?

>

> My grandchildren love the Horniman.

>

> If you want to go somewhere where no kids are

> allowed, maybe go somewhere else?

>

> Or if you don't like the behaviour you see, take

> it up with the parents?

>

> I have intervened in a screaming match between two

> kids in the cafe where the younger one was in

> danger of being pushed out of his high chair and

> the adult/s with them were nowhere to be seen.

>

> If you do nothing (eg report the butterfly

> grabbing to staff) how do you think the behaviour

> of some parents will change?


Agreed Sue which is why I chose my times to visit certain things that may have children attached. Nothing against them but it's a choice. I'm glad art galleries/museums are not seen as bastions of silent worship any more and welcome the small people but the next step is getting the adults with them to police (outrageous not normal) behaviour.

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why not extend the cafe (it's always full) to

> cover the whole of the ground floor, use most of

> the basement for a soft play area blah blah... moan moan...


It's a family museum - always has been. There's much more there for kids than there is for adults.


In fact, why bother going there without kids? Who's really interested in glass cabinets of flea-bitten taxidermy and old musical instruments?

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



> In fact, why bother going there without kids?

> Who's really interested in glass cabinets of

> flea-bitten taxidermy and old musical instruments?



Well, I am actually.


Have been there quite often without kids :))

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I used to recommend the musical instruments

> section to music students as it's a remarkable

> collection. Now I have to warn them that the

> chances of hearing the instruments in the

> electronic display are low



They were perfectly audible last time I was there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...