Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oakwood Midwives were fab. We had a very good service from them. Sadly overall, I don't rate the rest of Forest Hill Road Practice, whom I am no longer with.


My regular GP manipulated me into giving our daughter additional vitamin K drops at one postnatal app, then hassled me appallingly when I deviated from the standard immunisation schedule (we started a bit later and have more time in between).


Another GP there told me *wrongly* that I would have to stop breastfeeding my 2 month old daughter if I wanted to go on meds for postnatal depression.


And the final straw was the HV referring me to a nutritionist (a nutritionist?! she didn't even know the difference from a dietician!!) when my exclusively breastfed daughter was gaining weight slowly. She also gave me a bunch of rubbish advice about breastfeeding. We saw a private specialist who told us everything was fine in the end.


I would go to Forest Hill Road Practice for the Oakwood Midwives, then change practices after the birth.

Thanks for all the advice re Oakwood / Forest Hill road - does anyone know if they do blood tests on site? I have to have them regularly for a minor condition and it's really inconvenient to drag all the way to Dulwich hospital from Nunhead and then try to keep a toddler calm for 2 hours in the waiting room, that might make the difference as to weather it's worth changing at this point given the mixed reviews.


K

I'm with FHR and have also had fun with the HV's (there's only so much that my professional experience can help with).


Had them try to ref bugglet to out pts as having been born below the 0.4th centile, she remained still below the 0.4th centile (despite br/feeding well). She's now well into weaning and at last weigh in was above 0.4th centile - am v happy, but when I got home and looked in red book it said "now feeding well" grrr... even when giving top-up's, she still fed well, just not to their standard!


Luckily the out pt ref was put on ice after being seen by Dr Greaves - as she had 2 arms, 2 legs and was breathing he wasn't worried!


Needless to say the Oakwood MW's were fantastic (hello if any are having a peak ;-)) and hoping that when/if we have No 2 I'm still in their catchment.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...