Jump to content

Call out query


jollymummy

Recommended Posts

A bit of advice pls...


We rent our property out with a managing agent and they organised for a drain company to visit as the tenants noticed a strange smell. The company came out and charged a call out fee of ?120 but admitted they could not locate the issue and left. A second company was called who came out and rectified the problem. My question is, is it standard to make a call out charge and not actually fix anything?


Thanks all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A call-out for as much as ?120 is an issue, it's quite high - as is their failure to remedy - since there was a problem which was remedied by someone I would refuse to pay the call-out - or demand re-payment and threaten the small- claims court. It is legitimate to charge a call-out fee (though ?120 is steep) but if there was no remedial work then undertaken but which was actually needed this is trading under false pretences. If the charge is being made through your agent then they should remedy the situation.


Also - if the cause of the problem was an action of your tenants (for instance a blockage caused by wipes or other things disposed of which shouldn't have been put into a sewer) then they (not you) should pay for remedial work.


However, if you call someone out and the problem is not within their purview (or couldn't be found by anyone) then it is normal to pay a call-out - although at ?120 this is anyway a high charge. [As an example, calling out an electrician for a plumbing problem with central heating would be a legitimate charge, as, even if a problem did exist, it would not sit in the electrician's purview]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was this insurance, Maybe the first company were looking for the root cause (my insurance did that for a leak - need to fix the leak before replacing floorboards etc but there was no leak as it was bath splatter and seal)


Isn't so obvious - but if someone is dumping something nasty in the drains, or there's some kind of issue fixing it will just postpone the problem.


The root cause couldn't be found so they fixed the issue, maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My experience was that arranging a tradesman via a managing agent was always much more expensive than calling them yourselves. I never quite worked out if the agent was tacking on a percentage, the tradesman was inflating the fees to agents or there was some sort of kick-back agreement operating.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...