Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A bit of advice pls...


We rent our property out with a managing agent and they organised for a drain company to visit as the tenants noticed a strange smell. The company came out and charged a call out fee of ?120 but admitted they could not locate the issue and left. A second company was called who came out and rectified the problem. My question is, is it standard to make a call out charge and not actually fix anything?


Thanks all!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/167838-call-out-query/
Share on other sites

A call-out for as much as ?120 is an issue, it's quite high - as is their failure to remedy - since there was a problem which was remedied by someone I would refuse to pay the call-out - or demand re-payment and threaten the small- claims court. It is legitimate to charge a call-out fee (though ?120 is steep) but if there was no remedial work then undertaken but which was actually needed this is trading under false pretences. If the charge is being made through your agent then they should remedy the situation.


Also - if the cause of the problem was an action of your tenants (for instance a blockage caused by wipes or other things disposed of which shouldn't have been put into a sewer) then they (not you) should pay for remedial work.


However, if you call someone out and the problem is not within their purview (or couldn't be found by anyone) then it is normal to pay a call-out - although at ?120 this is anyway a high charge. [As an example, calling out an electrician for a plumbing problem with central heating would be a legitimate charge, as, even if a problem did exist, it would not sit in the electrician's purview]

Was this insurance, Maybe the first company were looking for the root cause (my insurance did that for a leak - need to fix the leak before replacing floorboards etc but there was no leak as it was bath splatter and seal)


Isn't so obvious - but if someone is dumping something nasty in the drains, or there's some kind of issue fixing it will just postpone the problem.


The root cause couldn't be found so they fixed the issue, maybe.

My experience was that arranging a tradesman via a managing agent was always much more expensive than calling them yourselves. I never quite worked out if the agent was tacking on a percentage, the tradesman was inflating the fees to agents or there was some sort of kick-back agreement operating.
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 4 fixtures...   Saturday 13th September Arsenal v Nottingham Forest AFC Bournemouth v Brighton & Hove Albion Crystal Palace v Sunderland Everton v Aston Villa Fulham v Leeds United Newcastle United v Wolverhampton Wanderers West Ham United v Tottenham Hotspur Brentford v Chelsea   Sunday 14th September Burnley v Liverpool Manchester City v Manchester United
    • They are being taxed into oblivion.    a lot of them, previously fully subscribed (we'll call you, don't call us) are no advertising desperately for new pupils, even paying for those bulk junk mail drops.   
    • More dirt https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce845w70g0yo
    • This thread should be updated with a new title. "Is Keith Starmer Toast?"    I would say yes. This is as bad as when Boris Johnson ignored Chris Pincher's behaviour. And Starmer piled in very heavily on Johnson for that. If he doesn't resign himself now he is an enormous hypocrite and this will be very damaging  indeed.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...