Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am very hopeful that Uber will do the necessary!


I've chatted with many Uber drivers (as you do on a ride home, cue Peter Kay "been busy?")and haven't yet had one complain about working for Uber, they all say it works well for them. This includes a friend's husband who uses Uber work to subsidise his other income. Obviously I don't really know the ins and outs though and I would always support workers being treated fairly.


Khan has got to be pretty confident on this one.

Uber encourages 'dumbing down'

what about Black Cab drivers who have spent years learning 'the knowledge' only to get priced out by cab drivers who don't know one street name. London is special because of Black Cab drivers who can get you from A to B without having to use an app. If Uber gets their license back, we'll be like every other international city with cab drivers that don't know their arse from their elbow. Anyone whose tried a yellow cab in New York knows what I mean.

I welcome this...

Just read Uber wants market share and fast (it's making huge losses) so it is in pole position to implement driverless taxis.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2017/07/10/uber-has-pole-position-in-race-to-develop-driverless-cars/#56355e5c7ab0


so then the driver issue goes (along with those jobs too) - and we are apparently not far off.

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blackcurrant Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > they won't stop running until the appeal process

> > is exhausted, which could be years away.


> They'll have to when their licence runs out.

>


Nope - Khan has already said if they appeal they can keep going until the legal process is complete.

ali2007 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Uber encourages 'dumbing down'

> what about Black Cab drivers who have spent years

> learning 'the knowledge' only to get priced out by

> cab drivers who don't know one street name.

> London is special because of Black Cab drivers who

> can get you from A to B without having to use an app.


Providing A and B involve the limited area around the City and the west end. Outside there, a black cab driver will turn to satnav as well.


In this day and age, the Knowledge is not a big advantage.

Delta cars are great. Use them once in a blue moon to get to Gatwick - good price (?45), good cars and good drivers. ?45 was what I paid in an incredibly expensive black cab ride home from East Croydon one night.


But oh dear, what will the LTDA have to complain about nowadays? Their three hates were Uber, The Mayor and cyclists. Now down to one.


And what will cabbies have to call into LBC and Radio London about - they seem to be the main people with free time on their hands to put the world to right.


And with all this free time why are'nt any of you on this site?


Anyway, irrespective of Uber, who are a bid dodgy but have changed the market (Sounds a bit like Ryanair), black cabs are under powered, over weight, polluting, and blocking up much of cettral London at this time of night. The regulations needs to be modernised to allow them to respond to market conditions, rather than control numbers that puts the value of the license plate through the roof.


And where were the cabbies during Wapping and Orgreave? Probably phoning LBC to complain about Northerners.


There are quite a few gauntlets laid down there.

I wouldn't be surprised if TfL has it's own version to replace Uber.


While Uber is convenient, it is unregulated and they have not complied. Possibly Corporate arrogance.


"TfL considers that Uber's approach and conduct demonstrate a lack of corporate responsibility in relation to a number of issues which have potential public safety and security implications. These include:


Its approach to reporting serious criminal offences.

Its approach to how medical certificates are obtained.

Its approach to how Enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks are obtained.

Its approach to explaining the use of Greyball in London - software that could be used to block regulatory bodies from gaining full access to the app and prevent officials from undertaking regulatory or law enforcement duties."

Loz Wrote:

---------------------------------

> Providing A and B involve the limited area around

> the City and the west end. Outside there, a black

> cab driver will turn to satnav as well.



Zackly - my experience of "the Knowledge" is that it's pretty sparse in the burbs (which it shouldn't be as it's a pretty long x-mile radius of Charing Cross). Then there's the "not on my way home mate", "not going that way" and all the other bollocks. Not to mention that as a cycke commuter, I find them the one group of road users I'm constantly justified in giving a wide berth (on account of random road behaviour).


Uber's a big player, but I bet pound for pound they're much less dangerous and much more compliant to regs than a lot of the local mini cab offices (E&C and Brixton offices late at night in years gone by spring to mind).


And workers' rights? I hope the anti-Uber bores are consistent in their boycotts....coz there are far, far worse offenders.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wouldn't be surprised if TfL has it's own version to replace Uber.


There's Hailo/myTaxi and Gett already. Black cab drivers have long rallied against apps and card payments. I suspect they don't like the paper trail.


It also means they have had their big privilege nullified... being able to pick up from the street. But since Uber, who stands on the street in the vague hope some black cab is going to be passing (and, as others have pointed out, deem your journey to be acceptable to them)? Open app, book journey, sit inside until you get buzzed.


Uber does have one big advantage, though - you can use it in places across the world.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Not to mention that as a cycke commuter,

> I find them the one group of road users I'm

> constantly justified in giving a wide berth (on

> account of random road behaviour).


True that - proportionately more dangerous behaviour from black cabs than from any other group of road users in my experience, not to mention the amount of moaning about bike lanes etc one gets as a passenger. On the plus side if you're double punctured with only one tube they are generally willing to let one put the bike in the back!


ETA Also, anecdotally, I've seen firsthand with black mates how many cabs will just drive by if a black person hails them...

I see the Black Cab complaints as those of luddites. The technology is there, it is already being used and the caariage office refuses to modernise with it. There is only ever one outcome to business models that don;t move with the times. As someone has pointed out, the carriage office wants a monopoly only to keep prices as high as possible. Even before Uber, black cabs complained about private mini cab companies. The Last time I took a Black Cab (years ago) it was at night from Lewisham Stn (off the last train) to Nunhead, and it cost ?17 - completely ridiculous. They charge for time and distance, and no of people, and pieces of luggage and there is a standing charge before the cab even moves anywhere too. All ways of racking up the fare. A mini cab would have cost ?6. That is why there is so little sympathy for the carriage office.
Uber are a disreputable company and very arrogant. Theirs is not a good business model. Maybe Sadiq Khan is gambling with this approach with the hope that whilst going through the appeal process Uber will undertake a thorough review of itself and come back with conciliatory gestures.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thought it was lovely, thank you for sharing 😊
    • They are very good
    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
    • Thought I'd add a comment as sadly there are now too many primary schools for the number of children in this area... St Anthony's is a wonderful school and my 2 sons were extremely happy throughout the time they were there. They have some open days for reception and  nursery in Nov I believe and welcome children and families of all faiths and backgrounds. It has lovely staff and I cannot recommend it more highly!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...