Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I stopped using black cabs when a number of times they didn't want to go to Dulwich as it "was out of their way" black cabs have made uber so popular by being slow to adapt and overly expensive. Afraid the local knowledge upper edge is simply obsolete now there is GPS.


As for The rationale that Uber drivers clog up londons streets, if londons public transport was better and cheaper than Uber then maybe more people would use it, plus London simply does not have the public transport capacity without Uber taking the strain off it

The coming week should be interesting. Uber are claiming they passed a compliance audit in April. Also, a series of meetings with TfL since then were cancelled. More interestingly, they say they have been trying to meet with Khan for a few months, but to no avail.


If TFL and Khan are seen to be trying to shut Uber out in any way unfairly, this may be quite telling at the appeal. Plus, I think the groundswell of opinion will have taken Khan a little bit by surprise.


I suspect a few meetings will be held PDQ between Uber and TFL (but not with Khan). Uber will make a few concessions (the reporting of allegations about drivers to the police being the main one) and TFL will claim victory and grant a new licence, probably for a limited time of one or two years.


And then the next day, black cabs will hold a protest and block Trafalgar Sq up again.

This thing about reporting drivers to the police bothers me a bit. I presume a minicab firm has a duty of confidentiality regarding the data of its passengers (where they've been, when etc) that might make a disclosure difficult.


But also isn't the onus on the victim to report their claim to the police first rather than to the employer of the alleged attacker? I'm not sure why the mini cab firm should be involved at all, beyond co-operating fully with the police once a complaint has been made.

Long time user of both Uber and black cabs here... I use both depending on the situation. To add some balance: For sure black cabs have issues with cost and driver attitude but I've seen some positive changes as they've come under pressure. Keep in mind - their costs are set by the regulator (PCO), they are required to use a specific designated vehicle type (TX4 or Mercedes van) which accommodate disabled passengers and they have to complete 3 years of training on road craft (The Knowledge) that still delivers passenger value and safety in the age of sat nav.


I don't believe it's fair on drivers to study/train for 3 years, spend ?55k on a vehicle and work to a fixed price tarrif if anyone can turn up and blag an Uber licence in days. It's an unfair playing field and I feel for those who have invested years of their lives getting undercut by a toxic company that amongst many issues doesn't follow saftey regulations. Uber is cheaper because it is subsidised by billions of VC/PE cash to disrupt existing biz models. The only viable reason for doing this is to gain market share and move back to market level pricing. It's amazing how many people don't seem to get this.


Either partially deregulate the whole industry to bring everyone level (bad for safety) or re-regulate to accommodate the latest app driven business models.


Finally the latest MyTaxi app is almost as good as Ubers and allows excellent advance booking and has plenty promos. They have offered 50% discounts on black cab fares this week and it is very reliable IMO.

Wimpole Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keep in mind - their costs are set by the regulator (PCO)


... and ...


> Finally the latest MyTaxi app is almost as good as

> Ubers and allows excellent advance booking and has

> plenty promos. They have offered 50% discounts on

> black cab fares this week and it is very reliable IMO.


If black cab costs are set by the regulator, how can they offer 50% off?

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wimpole Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Keep in mind - their costs are set by the

> regulator (PCO)

>

> ... and ...

>

> > Finally the latest MyTaxi app is almost as good

> as

> > Ubers and allows excellent advance booking and

> has

> > plenty promos. They have offered 50% discounts

> on

> > black cab fares this week and it is very

> reliable IMO.

>

> If black cab costs are set by the regulator, how

> can they offer 50% off?


Did he switch on the meter :)


I had a load like that in Swansea as a youngster.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wimpole Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Keep in mind - their costs are set by the

> regulator (PCO)

>

> ... and ...

>

> > Finally the latest MyTaxi app is almost as good

> as

> > Ubers and allows excellent advance booking and

> has

> > plenty promos. They have offered 50% discounts

> on

> > black cab fares this week and it is very

> reliable IMO.

>

> If black cab costs are set by the regulator, how

> can they offer 50% off?


Subsidised by the app provider. But unlike Uber only short term and promotional so normal competitive practice.

Everyone knows you can't get a black cab to South London.....and even if you get lucky it's going to cost a fortune.


I began using Addison Lee as they were safer for women- sending car reg details etc.


Uber excelled Addison Lee in terms of convenience, safety and cost.


Obviously I hope Uber can shape up in terms of TFL's requirements to make various improvements.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A quick update - my InPost parcels are being accepted sporadically at Barry's, but only one at a time and every few days, after many refusals - one was refused SEVEN times over about ten days - and several phone calls. As a comparison, I had a message from Yodel that a parcel that was going to Barry's is being delivered to another nearby store, which is interesting...
    • The "Community Benefits" are documented on P12-16 of the Consultation Document. Basically unsubstantiated estimates that it benefits local businesses, claims that it provides "opportunities" for local food traders, businesses & people (the term "opportunities" being meaningless - I have opportunities to win the lottery) without any details, facts or figures, and discounted tickets for local residents (which unsurprisingly seldom sell out). The only direct financial benefit to the Park is a £1000 "Biodiversity Fund" and an undisclosed amount for an "Environmental Impact Fee" - looking at how it was spent this year (flower beds in the playground & Sexby garden) I suspect it would be a similarly small figure. The actual site hire fee - claimed as "commercially sensitive" and therefore undisclosed - is spent on: • Funding the council’s free events programme and Cultural Celebrations Fund • Subsidised fees for community events in the borough • Off-setting the running costs of the Events service, which supports the delivery of the free community events programme  Again, no details given, just vague concepts - can anyone name any of these free & subsidised community events? Or what the "Cultural Celebrations Fund" is or does? It doesn't really sound like any of it is worth  the disturbance, restrictions, noise, litter, environmental damage and negative impact on wildlife in our Park.  
    • The organisers must have spent a fortune on the display..imagine how p**s*d off they must have been!!!! Blink and you missed it kind of thing
    • We also recommend Aaron.  Very reliable, reasonably priced and did a fantastic job on our hallway and bedroom ceiling.  A pleasure to work with and left the house very tidy at the end of the job.  Thank you 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...