Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Auntie Mimi.

>

> Responding won't do much, as I'm pretty sure both

> of those are robots.

>

> There's another thread on it here....



Oh My God ! Huguenot not again. Positive thinking is always good for all of us.


if not I should asked for my trophy back.

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh my word! One of them ended with something

> like: "I'm not jealous".

>

> How spooky is that? Or is it...

>

>

> Edited 1 time(s). Last edit was today, 05:43 pm by

> Woofmarkthedog.


Who am I to be times can heel all purple but you say I prevent the square of the hypotenuse fans can hurt too sometimes.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the Duckworth Lewis

> method in full flow.


Is that where they put the little widget in the can? If so it?s really not cricket at all. Except perhaps in everyones' favourite Irish stout. But that?s only because the leprechauns still farm proper traditional widgets. Those fake widgets from Burton on Trent can fuck right off though.

Here's my latest idiotic private message. A new sender though. From Mcelves - another computer generated gook. Can you believe this shit?



Hi Jah!


Are you upset. I am sorry you are confusing me with Lynda. I have asked her to help in the forum becouse I was going to be very busy at work for the las 2 weeks

Everything you have here is not me. Beleive it or not don't know what happen so far

I am just checking now becouse tomorrow I don't work.

She has done some stupid things I have asked her to help but not in that way

and she is 17 years old is true am sorry if things went on the wrong way can you

please update me for what is happening or shall I read from the last 2 weeks.

Lynda know everything she is good sometimes but for her age she is mad at times

but she is a good friend she said she manage to get an appoinment with

one kentucky don't know if is truth as I don't understand what everybody is talking

about now.


Hugs,

Bellen/LMac

Similar kind of rubbish which I received. I forwarded mine on to Admin., though I am unsure as to what Admin. can actually do.


They are annoying (not Admin.), that's for sure.


Admin, perhaps you could shed some light on this new "problem"?

Laddy Muck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > You sure that's not 'Bellen/LMuc'?

>

> Care to be more specific Mr. Medic? If you are

> suggesting what I think you could be, I should

> advise you that Her Ladyship underwent (virtual)

> gender re-assignment and, as such, no longer

> exists!


:) Yes, I had explained everything to the administrator

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...