Room(s) available for rent in light and spacious 3-bedroom maisonette in Peckham/ Nunhead

By hwilliams
October 9, 2017 in Property

Recommended Posts

hwilliams

Posted October 9, 2017

- Share

Posted October 9, 2017

I currently have 2 bedrooms available (one double, one single) in my very light and spacious 3 bedroom maisonette in Peckham/ Nunhead, close to Peckham Rye park. The current lodger, who is in the double room, is leaving on 18th October.

I own and live in the maisonette, so I am only looking for one flatmate, but I am flexible about which room I rent out, and how the arrangements work. The most important thing is the person- I am looking for someone who wants to live in a comfortable home, and who is relaxed, respectful and straightforward.

The double is ?750 p/m full time (bills included) and the single is ?650 (bills included).

They are also available for Mon- Fri rent for a lower amount.

A fuller description and photos are here: https://www.spareroom.co.uk/flatshare/london/peckham_rye/3896467

Please PM me for any further information.

thanks

Hannah

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Latest One Dulwich update
  
  By Earl Aelfheah · Posted 4 minutes ago
  
  @Rockets : No one has changed the definition of 'consultation' or 'referendum', or switched the terms. They are different things and have different meanings. You can even check this in a dictionary if you're not sure about it. Regarding the most recent consultation (at least the one I assume you're referring to), it was about the design of the Square. It was not a consultation on the existence of the LTN itself, despite (again rather desperately and a little embarrassingly) some people pretending it was. As for One Dulwich, I think what vexes people has been very clearly articulated, and very conspicuously ducked by those posting their regular missives: Firstly, they're claiming that people are accidentally driving through the square because of bad signage / lack of clarity. This is both ridiculous and ironic. Ridiculous because no sensible person could possibly believe it to be true, and ironic because they've objected to any updates to the layout (instead trying to pretend it's a rerun of the LTN consultation itself which closed several years ago as noted above). Secondly, they've claimed that someone has been pressurising the emergency services, yet fail to say who, or how. You seem to have suggested it may be the involvement of the 'far left' 😄 Anyway, It's all very tedious. If you want to improve signage, engage in that conversation, instead of trying to reopen debates that have finished. If you're going to claim intimidation of the emergency services, you probably want to give details and have some evidence. And if you think someone can drive through the square by mistake, you may want to question what you consider to be safe and competent driving. 🤣
- Royal Mail Late Deliveries and the price we have to pay
  
  By alice · Posted 8 minutes ago
  
  Got mine two days ago plus yesterday I received a second-class letter which was posted the day before in Sydenham
- Royal Mail Late Deliveries and the price we have to pay
  
  By ianr · Posted 20 minutes ago
  
  Back, regrettably, to the Private Eye benchmark test. Have folk expecting the issue that would normally have been delivered on Wednesday the 24th received theirs yet, and if so, when?
- Rubie - Lost Cat
  
  By Froglander · Posted 2 hours ago
  
  What area are you in?

Sign In