Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just been served - at Franklins - a pile of mashed potato and cabbage mixture which had not been fried and had no crispy bits on the outside (or anywhere else) at all.


Surely the whole point of bubble is that the crispy outside contrasts with the soft middle? Plus the butter gives it a nice taste?


I thought they had forgotten to fry it, but I was told it was supposed to be like that :-S


Surely not??

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17262-bubble-and-squeak-potato-dish/
Share on other sites

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How does this compare?


xxxxxx


Yes, I had already looked that up and printed it out, together with Nigel Slater's recipe for "classic bubble and squeak".


I intend to take it round to them.


They shouldn't be putting something on the menu as bubble when it clearly isn't.


I have had it there before done properly, but this is the second time I've had it served up like this. I wonder whether they just can't be bothered to fry it :-S


It didn't even taste to have been seasoned. Very strange for Franklins, whose brunches are usually very good.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What Franklins do is not B&S, it's vegetables.


xxxxxxx


But my point is, it is described as bubble on the menu, not as - for example - "mashed potato mixed with cooked bits of cabbage and formed into a lukewarm mound on the plate".

I think we're all agreed that Franklins are in the wrong (If there's any remaining doubt just Google B&S and "Jamie at Home"). You've a right to your money back but I'm not sure that Trading Standards will be that bothered. But if you do give TS a call, let us know how you get on.

Of course I'm not going to involve Trading Standards, don't be so bloody stupid :))


And I don't want my money back.


I just want Franklins to cook bubble how it's supposed to be cooked, to which end I am going to take them round some recipes :))


ETA: I've just re-read your post, and if you weren't intending to be sarcastic, then I apologise.

I can't believe someone from Franklins hasn't been on here apologising/excusing/defending etc.


Now if it were the Victoria they'd have posted the same day and probably offered to cook you a fresh B&S whilst giving you a run down of the drinks/rooms/food they offer (waits for name-recognition alarm to go off in SE15 and someone from Victoria to rush to forum).


Edited to say yes, the above is meant to be sarcasm - but only the stuff about the vic.

*looks aghast*


Who needs a recipe for bubble & squeak? Who? (apart from er, Franklins, eh Sue?) :)) its supposed to be simply leftovers of cabbage and potato, fried. And if not *actual* leftovers, then lots of cabbage and potato, fried.


Dearest HonaloochieB, what's all this about thyme? That's a bit bloomin' well fancy, no?


*heads to Maria's cafe*


(thanks Val) (tu)

They did say they had done it in an oven - but there was no sign of any butter or oil, and no sign of any crispiness on any side whatsoever. Just a mound of mash. Not even slight browning of the mash. Apart from small brown bits inside the mash, which I assume were bits of old roast potatoes, however even those bits weren't crispy.


Maybe it was a microwave oven :))


To be fair, they did offer to give me something else, but that wasn't the point really, anyway I was starving!


Anyway, I shall be taking them round the recipes and see what the outcome is .....

murphy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, do you think it's a good idea to give the

> highy qualified chef at Franklins a copy of

> Jamie's Sizzlin Bubble & Squeak?

>

> You might find the outcome is "The Goose is

> Stuffed" appearing on a Franklins menu rather

> sharpish :))


xxxxxx


Don't care how qualified he is, he clearly doesn't know how bubble should be cooked.


Had his version been nice to eat, even though not what I was expecting, that would have been different, but it wasn't. I couldn't even eat it all, it was rubbish. It was very prettily piled up on the plate with a sprig of baby tomatoes on top of it, however.


Don't really care what he thinks of me for suggesting he reads a Nigel Slater recipe (not Jamie!) either.


Stuffed Goose - :)) - not the first time that joke has been made, and probably won't be the last :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Probably more helpful to ask simply whether McCash was affiliated with the Greens before becoming a Labour councillor. Trying to explain your thought process and unravel your fevered imagination (particularly when it comes to local politica) is the kind of thing that might require several years of psychoanalysis.
    • made the mistake of going to megans twice in DV.. would never make that mistake a 3rd time. Ditto I liked Romeo Jones a lot they did lovely soups and sandwiches and coffee too and such loveley staff.
    • Aren't most marxists radical by default...and he was a self proclaimed marxist on his twitter feed for years but deleted it as I suspect it did not sit well at Labour HQ. The big worry for Labour might be that he takes votes away from them (but not enough for him to win a seat) especially as there may be a significant protest vote against them at the national level as they are making such a pig's ear of things. I suspect though Labour are glad to see the back of him - to say he was a thorn in their side is an understatement and his loss of the leadership of the council was clearly part of the purge Labour has been embarking on to rid itself of some of the far-left lunatic fringe that have blighted them for so long. The Greens of course are willingly take any disaffected far-left Labour rejects in the same way Reform are hovvering up the lunatic elements of the Tories. The fact he went in with both barrels on Labour is hardly surprisingly but wonderfully hypocritical of someone who thought they were about to lead a Labour council. My how politicians flip-flop to suit their own personal agenda. How long before he falls out with the Greens...where to then? Why do I think he had an affiliation with the Greens before he became a Labour councillor? Or did I imagine that?
    • It’s a shame that that topic is closed/archived for further replies.  It sounds like a great and helpful business. I’d love to see some of the pictures that had been posted.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...