Jump to content

Recommended Posts

To add a bit more detail on the editing out story, Ridley Scott originally wanted Christopher Plummer for the role, but the the studio insisted on Spacey because they wanted someone more popular.


At the moment Spacey is anything but, and is probably box office poison.


So as far as I can see they have the following choices.


1. Standing by Spacey as they are only allegations and release the film. Profits be dammed!

2. Hold off the release until

a) Spacey totally clears his name and becomes a massive hero. Box office gold, but very doubtful.

b) Spacey is charged with something, or admits to something. Then re-shoot with someone else.

3. Re-shoot with someone else right now while Scott is still available and get some positive promotion as a bonus.


I'm not fond of the court of public opinion, but unfortunately in the film industry public opinion is almost everything. If it wasn't for the public's very high opinion of him he wouldn't have got the role over Plummer in the first place.


Perhaps editing someone out of a film because of allegations is disproportionate. However, do people think that not bothering to go see a film because of one of the stars alleged behaviour is disproportionate? You don't even have to feel that strongly about it for that. It is really easy to not go see a film and go see something else.


That is the feeling the studio is up against.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He has apologised for quote 'deeply inappropriate

> behaviour' and he's 'seeking evaluation and

> treatment'. Doesn't look like a denial to me, and

> sheer number of stories must be enough to worry

> the producers about box office. Editing people in

> and out of films isn't uncommon given CGI and the

> use of body doubles and stunt people.


There are now so many "accusations" (or whatever we can call them as many are admitted) that you re-shoot and that guy gets "accused". maybe bring in some new guys to be safe


Current New York Times list (US based)


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/10/us/men-accused-sexual-misconduct-weinstein.html

On the grounds that women are victims, men are perpetrators? That wouldn't appear to apply in Kevin Spacey's case - unless any of the beards genuinely thought they were girlfriends.


Of course, there may be more to it if you know the people involved and the context. One recent female victim - whose story is perfectly plausible, knowing the industry - at about the same time came on to someone I know and hit her in the face when she was turned down with a jokey remark. (I wasn't a witness but the person told me immediately afterwards).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But the second weekend mentioned is a free community event? Horniman gardens often have events. At least, I have been to several in the past. I wouldn't have thought the green area of the park at Telegraph Hill was big enough?
    • Paul just did my bathroom, very swift and neat job and I would highly recommend. I got a few quotes and his was the cheapest as well.
    • It would be a relief if that is the case but GALA, at least, have a vested interest in expanding the event to more than one weekend; with all the infrastructure in place it makes financial sense for them to get more use out of it.   
    • Well seem to recall at one stage was Southwark responsibility. Must have changed.. Then I seem to recall about the damage to the grass area especially if been wet!  Assume it should be council decision as to whether event should go on if in extreme heat and equally extreme rain.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...