Jump to content

Recommended Posts

To add a bit more detail on the editing out story, Ridley Scott originally wanted Christopher Plummer for the role, but the the studio insisted on Spacey because they wanted someone more popular.


At the moment Spacey is anything but, and is probably box office poison.


So as far as I can see they have the following choices.


1. Standing by Spacey as they are only allegations and release the film. Profits be dammed!

2. Hold off the release until

a) Spacey totally clears his name and becomes a massive hero. Box office gold, but very doubtful.

b) Spacey is charged with something, or admits to something. Then re-shoot with someone else.

3. Re-shoot with someone else right now while Scott is still available and get some positive promotion as a bonus.


I'm not fond of the court of public opinion, but unfortunately in the film industry public opinion is almost everything. If it wasn't for the public's very high opinion of him he wouldn't have got the role over Plummer in the first place.


Perhaps editing someone out of a film because of allegations is disproportionate. However, do people think that not bothering to go see a film because of one of the stars alleged behaviour is disproportionate? You don't even have to feel that strongly about it for that. It is really easy to not go see a film and go see something else.


That is the feeling the studio is up against.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He has apologised for quote 'deeply inappropriate

> behaviour' and he's 'seeking evaluation and

> treatment'. Doesn't look like a denial to me, and

> sheer number of stories must be enough to worry

> the producers about box office. Editing people in

> and out of films isn't uncommon given CGI and the

> use of body doubles and stunt people.


There are now so many "accusations" (or whatever we can call them as many are admitted) that you re-shoot and that guy gets "accused". maybe bring in some new guys to be safe


Current New York Times list (US based)


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/10/us/men-accused-sexual-misconduct-weinstein.html

On the grounds that women are victims, men are perpetrators? That wouldn't appear to apply in Kevin Spacey's case - unless any of the beards genuinely thought they were girlfriends.


Of course, there may be more to it if you know the people involved and the context. One recent female victim - whose story is perfectly plausible, knowing the industry - at about the same time came on to someone I know and hit her in the face when she was turned down with a jokey remark. (I wasn't a witness but the person told me immediately afterwards).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
    • Yup Juan is amazing (and his partner can't remember her name!). Highly recommend the wine tastings.  Won't be going to the new chain.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...