Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Today's fascinating physics fact...


Nuclear bombs generate their 'blast energy' according to Einstein's equation e=mc2 (energy released = mass x speed of light squared).


So a 20 kiloton bomb (the size they dropped on Nagasaki) lost about 0.8 grams of mass - about the weight of a five pound note.


So as you stroll into the pub tonight, it's worth considering that you're packing the equivalent of 5 or 6 nuclear bombs in your wallet.


Scary eh?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/
Share on other sites

Yeah. The really wierd thing is that although the bomb materials lose mass, they don't actually lose any material.


This is because the 'mass' of an object isn't just defined by the particles it's made up of, but by the energy within them.


A good example is water: water is made up of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. However, water (h2o) actually has lower mass than 2 x hydrogen and 1 x oxygen atoms, even though nothing has disappeared.


As you've probably guessed, this is because they're in a lower 'energy state' - so energy is released when hydrogen and oxygen are combined to create water.


This is how the Space Shuttle main engine works - it combines hydrogen and oxygen releasing the energy. Hence that big plume of 'smoke' out of the back isn't smoke at all - it's water.


In a nuclear bomb the by products of nuclear fission have the same 'particles' that they had before: they just have lower mass.


Freaky.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/#findComment-438939
Share on other sites

It took me 18 clicks to get from:


Naftoruon

Naftoruon is a village in the municipality of Osak?cə in the Lankaran Rayon of Azerbaijan - this was a random article selection.


to


Property (Philosophy)In modern philosophy, mathematics, and logic, a property is an attribute of an object


It's like an intelligent variation of Six Degree of Kevin Bacon.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/#findComment-439196
Share on other sites

I have never thought of chemical reactions such as burning hydrogen as producing changes in mass so thankyou hugs for enlightening me.

Though for the casual observer, producing water from oxygen and hydrogen is not a 'nuclear' reaction in the same vein as an atomic bomb. The changes in energy state are to do with electrons and not part of the nucleus.

Agreed?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/#findComment-439255
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You are right . It isn't going to change him for the better. Sending such a negative message is potentially counter-productive. Trump is narcissistic, arrogant, unpredictable, spiteful, divisive, and dishonest, with a penchant for a total a disregard for democratic norms.  He is one who bears a grudge so there's a case to be made for not offending him as he could react with a bunch of  adverse actions  such as  deciding to increase import tariffs on UK exports to the US.      
    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...