Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm meeting with council officers next week (this is for prelim discussions on the running of the club)and will raise the points raised here. Gussy, I don't know if you are aware that the funding for such schemes was cut by central Government (early intervention funding ie for surestart and other childrens services) Southwark and some other inner London boroughs lost 90 pounds per child in grant funding compared to eg 30 pounds in Richmond and other more affluent boroughs.


At Council assembly on Wednesday 270k was allocated in the Capital building program for rebuilding the one o clock club. (FYI the Lib Dems voted against this.) This together with the money already allocated by Greener Cleaner Safer means that the facility will be rebuilt.

Renata

Hi Fushia,

I don't know about access, but will ask this at the meeting, but I do know the official opening is on Saturday 23rd July, just in time for the school/nursery summer holidays. Unfortunately I had previous inflexible plans for the day, but I think the other two Peckham Rye Councillors, Victoria Mills and Gavin Edwards will be there.

Renata

Renata Hamvas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm meeting with council officers next week (this

> is for prelim discussions on the running of the

> club)and will raise the points raised here. Gussy,

> I don't know if you are aware that the funding for

> such schemes was cut by central Government (early

> intervention funding ie for surestart and other

> childrens services) Southwark and some other inner

> London boroughs lost 90 pounds per child in grant

> funding compared to eg 30 pounds in Richmond and

> other more affluent boroughs.

>

> At Council assembly on Wednesday 270k was

> allocated in the Capital building program for

> rebuilding the one o clock club. (FYI the Lib Dems

> voted against this.) This together with the money

> already allocated by Greener Cleaner Safer means

> that the facility will be rebuilt.

> Renata


Renata, I just don't understand why on earth would there be money to rebuild, but there's no money to run the place? Why are they allocating money to it when there is such a dire need to make cuts everywhere? For goodness sake the libraries might be closing down, but I know, we could really do with a nice shiny new 1 o clock club. Totally doesn't make sense and is awful awful planning, it makes you wonder who on earth is running the council.


Does the Capital Building Program generously give money to building places, but then thats it? Set it up yourself and good luck?


Rebuilding is good, of course, but at what cost? A nice new building that we end up having either a small allocated slot for, or to have to pay for some 'class'. If that's the case I probably won't use it. There's enough other things like that available in the area. The main reason I use the 1 o clock club is because its free and a DROP IN. I really hope the future 'vendor' retains this ethos, but I'm sceptical. Personally I'd rather keep the old shack that it is and it stays open as is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From what I have gathered from Bradbury Oak residents  I have spoken with, that at a meeting with RNIB earlier in the year, none of the residents were in favour of new build. There is the implication that rent rises are anticipated to help towards building costs. Rent is currently in the region of £300 pw - as with most sheltered housing (council and Housing Association), Since these rents also include maintenance charges, utility charges - Housing Benefit is only applicable to the actual 'rent element' per flat.
    • At the Dulwich Hill SNT meeting last night we spoke about Met. Engage. Dulwich Hill had signed up 185 households. Scheme  had been trialled in other parts of the country successfully and now the Met. Police are rolling it out, To the end of August, the Met Police had gathered 17,000 registrations which equites to 2% of households.
    • Personally, I think the death sentance should be brought back for anyone found to be harming animals. 
    • When you dig into the site, there's an ancillary domain also involved in the system: neighbourhoodalert.co.uk;  and one pointed to by the latter as an example, stayintheknow.co.uk, which seems to have been set up by Lancashire.  All three long validated by Nominet and with same registrar.    metengage_etc_whois.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...