Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At a public meeting with Tessa Jowell on Saturday there was a discussion about the housing shortage and what to do about it. Tessa seemed keen to explore people's attitudes on the extent to which people would accept limits on private property rights as a solution to this problem. A strong example was shared of a new build block where the low cost housing was all sold and occupied and the private flats were sold but mostly unoccupied.


The parable of the talents would be seem pretty clear that leaving a useful asset like a flat unoccupied would take some explaining. If you lived in a hamlet of 10 families where your neighbour's child needed to set up home with a new wife and an absentee landlord had left the only remaining dwelling locked and empty, you might be quite clear on right and wrong.


I once worked with someone from Copenhagen on a project in Sweden. They wouldn't stay more than one weekend in a row (even though they had a local partner) because they feared a neighbour would tell the council their privately owned flat was unoccupied and the council compulsorily let it underneath them.


What would Londoners put up with?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17499-housing-shortage/
Share on other sites

Well this is where the details might be difficult to iron out. I would think that once a local authority compulsory let your porperty, they may have some control over rent too. Because whether we want to accept that or not, the unprecadented growth in the housing market of the recent decades can not continue as it has done. People in low paid jobs are increasingly finding it difficult to find suitable affordable accomodation in the south. The cut to caps in housing benefit are not imo going to change that situation either.
I once heard Charles Kennedy say that if all the empty rooms above shops were let out as dwellings a huge dent would be made in the housing shortage. I started to look up above shops, and he was right! There are more empty rooms than enough above our high street shops that would make good homes for people. Surely a little pressure on shop owners would make these empty spaces available.

Last time I checked Southwark had just over 5,000 empty homes (out of 107,000) and 14,000 people on the housing waiting list.


I had a recent item of casework where a neighbour wanted an empty property to be lived in. After investigatino it transpired the owner visits once or twice a year to fix the garden mess and pays council tax. Truly bizarre. I think the quoted 1 week Swedish model OTT but I can sympathasise with the concept.

Think what a boost if even half of those homes were sold or let to the local economy apart from the quality of life for new tenants and home owners.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Last time I checked Southwark had just over 5,000

> empty homes (out of 107,000) and 14,000 people on

> the housing waiting list.


I may be showing my ignorance here... but where do those 14,000 people currently live?

The government can?t go buggering about with people?s private property rights. It?s probably illegal but also against my instincts of what a government should do.


They can tax the bejesus out of them for leaving their properties empty. If they do this they either motivate the owner to put the property on the market or up for rent or they get a big chunk of extra income that they can use to build more houses.


I wonder if good old Tessa has any holiday homes or buy-to-let properties of her own. She seems so concerned.

Awfully eager to jump to conclusions on my ?line? on the upper classes. There is a big difference between A) owning property in a country and B ) owning the country and allowing people to buy property off you but still maintaining ownership over it.


But then I?m no expert on leasehold, the historical impact of the feudal system on modern property laws and its subsequent social impact in countries in the old world. Although you seem to be so I?ll agree with whatever you have to say on it.

I have disdain for people who take a system which should exist to provide all people in society with access to the most fundamental security in life and use it in order to enrich themselves by exploiting others and denying them access to that security. That doesn?t mean I have disdain for the concept of property ownership.

Not sure what the solution to this problem, on lack of housing and with the cuts this will make things harder for people to find affordable housing in the capital for give my ignorance but where are they going to put new arrivals from the EU and other countries if there is a shortage. I am a little concern about this as this causes tension in communities who are dealing with lack of resources as it is.


I went with my elderly neighbour to see her housing officer, as we got to the reception area a man was complaining about some repairs that needs to be done there was a Muslim lady standing next to him as the housing officer was explaining to him the procedure he then said ?but if that was the likes of her you would see to it immediately one rule us another for them lot innit? I did not see what happen as I went in with my neighbour in an office to see her housing officer. I also witness something like this in Bermondsey as well.

There are 2 organisations I know of who are actively trying to offer solutions to the housing problem - one is Priced Out - has facebook page, the other is the Intergenerational Foundation www.intergenerational.org.uk. Another source is "The Jilted Generation" by Shiv Malik and Ed Howker, both journalists (one for The Guardian and the other for The Spectator).


Until we can encourage older generations, many of whom live on their own in large properties, to down-size (maybe by tax incentives) gridlock will be maintained in both the rental market and buying. Average monthly rents have hit record ?700 a month. Average age of a first time buyer now 37 years.


People in big houses don't realise that their properties are only worth something if they can sell them. If the younger generations can't afford to get on the housing ladder then there will be no one to buy the properties and prices will fall. Hold out is all I can say. Fears of a double dip housing crash in papers today!

Ridiculous property prices though are not the result of under-occupation by home owners.


The only thing that will bring property prices down is a shortage of buyers. In the past two decades, whenever that looked likely, mortgage lenders and banks simply changed the goalposts on lending to keep things bouyant. Return to some level of regulation (whatever that may be) would help return the housing sector back to normal market forces.


Keen to look at the arguments presented by the links you suggest though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Back on topic (!),  just a reminder that the new incarnation of the ED Forum drinks will be in The Palmerston TOMORROW Wednesday 11 June from 7pm. Turn immediately left as you come in by the main  Lordship Lane entrance, and we will be in the area there. Hope that at least a few of you will be up for getting to know some of your fellow forum members in real life!
    • For the past 15 years, I’ve been subjected to persistent passive-aggressive bullying and harassment by my upstairs neighbours. Their behaviour has included tampering with my plants, opening bin bags and questioning me about their contents, and interfering with misdelivered post — some of which appeared to have been opened. There has also been consistent noise disruption, like loud door banging and deliberately dropping heavy objects. They often laugh or stare at me when I’m in the garden, creating a constant sense of intimidation. Much of their conduct is subtle and hard to prove, often falling into a grey area that could easily be dismissed as paranoia, which makes it even more distressing. In the early years, I sometimes responded, but I realised this only seemed to encourage them. Since then, I’ve tried to remain calm and avoid confrontation — but unfortunately, this seems to have escalated things. After the recent death of a close family member, they left a condolence note, which at first seemed kind — but it came with a request to cut back my laurel bush, which I maintain for privacy, as I often feel watched in my own garden. The timing and nature of the request felt inappropriate. Still, I arranged for a gardening service and slightly reduced the laurel, though likely not as much as they wanted. Shortly after, one neighbour commented on how lovely one of my potted plants looked — which struck me as unusual, since we’ve barely spoken in years. Just days later, they told me the same plant looked like it was dying and asked if they should water it. Soon after, it rapidly turned yellow, brittle, and died — in a way that looked clearly unnatural. From photos, it appears the plant was poisoned, likely with a chemical weed killer. Access to that area is restricted — it’s behind a locked front gate monitored by a Smart CCTV camera. No one else had access, and it would be very difficult for someone to climb over the wall unnoticed. Given the timing and condition of the plant, I strongly suspect it was deliberately poisoned. I brought this up in a chat with my next-door neighbours, and they revealed they’d lost three trees along the same fence line over the past few months. One of them had previously been asked for access to cut back those very trees. One of the affected trees was a mature silver birch, whose sudden death should leave chemical evidence if tested. I’ve reported the incident to the Environment Agency and requested soil testing to check for toxins. The police have also been notified. I’ve installed another CCTV camera for additional monitoring. I’m not looking for confrontation — I just want to live peacefully and without further interference. But their behaviour continues to feel calculated and harassing. Has anyone experienced anything similar? What steps would you recommend next? I feel at a loss as to how to protect my space and sanity.
    • The Post Offcie certify copy documents. Check with whoever needs it if they would be appropriate 
    • https://williambaileysolicitors.co.uk/ William Bailey is a well-established local solicitors firm based in Goose Green I've used them in the past with no complaints
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...