Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I hear that some of the more right on Glastonbury Festival goers are planning a protest against Sir Bonio's tax dodging. If I had realised I may have got a ticket, as it would have been worth going just for that. I was previously hopeful of getting tickest to Live8 or Live Earth or whatever it was called so I could publicly rip up (or burn) the ticket outside Hyde Park. Personally I'd happily protest just because he is a annoying gobs*ite.


Can all of you going join in the proest on my behalf please?


As for his musical talent here's one I made earlier: www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfKgooVacz8

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17675-u2-glastonbury-tax-protest/
Share on other sites

Worth noting that until 2006, artists in Ireland were tax exempt. You can't really blame Bono for the fact that the celtic tiger is now whimpering. And anyway the Stones have long had the same arrangement with a Netherlands domicile, ltd co and low corporation tax but they don't get any stick because they are cool.


Granted he can be a bit of a %$?& but there are more deserving targets for this type of protest than Bono.

You are off the mark there Mr B my friend, the exemption you refer to is intended to apply to small time musicians and only applies to 250k pa which is a small percentage of U2s annual income of many squillions.


They use Netherlands double tax traties and pay little tax in their home country. As they are unwilling to pay Irish taxes the man in the street picks up his extra share of the bill, which he can ill afford.


So much for them being Irish heroes. Take, take, take (and very publically try to help Africa while letting down their home country).


The comparison with Rolling Stones is wrong too as RS moved to France when the tax rate here was 85%. U2 feel a corporate tax rate of 12.5 % in Ireland is too much for them. Shameful.

Mickster - you're correct in that the Irish tax exemption was (and still is) intended to benefit and support smaller artists with average incomes i.e. < 25,000 Euros and not corporate behemoths like U2. However the 250k limit you refer to was only introduced in 2007...for 30 odd years before that it was zero. U2 would have benefited from that when they started out back in the 80's. Perhaps when they got their success (insert arbitrary number here) they should have stuck their hand up and offered to exempt themselves from the artists exemption and pay the government more tax - but who has ever done that?


If they were truly a band of conscience, then perhaps they could have taxed themselves in kind, by setting up some kind of visible charitable foundation but the press would have panned them for that too. Their regular donations like the 5Million euros this year to Music Generation (Irish charity to help Musicians) go largely unnoticed. In many ways they can't win.


I don't doubt for a second that Bono's a twat and guilty of rank hypocrisy. Didn't he fly his hat half way around the world by private jet? Surely the mark of a man lost in his own rectum. But the average man on the street in Ireland is struggling because of property greed, corruption and ill monetary policy throughout the system.


From the politicians to your average Joe who took a massive remortgage to fund some nice holidays and new car or whatever. Laying the financial woes of Ireland on Bono just seems a bit harsh and misguided.


The Art uncut protest at Glasto is a protest at the use of what is legal off shore financial planning to be tax efficient. It's what every incorporated entity has been doing for the last century; banks, insurance companies, telecos, rock stars, children's novelists. They're entitled to their view but I'd rather Art had a pop at the politicians, legislators and regulators instead.


Mick - My Rolling Stones example was based on their use of Netherlands holding company structure similar to that of U2 and run by the same people (Promogroup). Between 1986 and 2006 the Stones paid less than ?5M tax on earnings of approx ?235 Million. Granted, Jagger steers clear of the Mandela/Geldof political posturing but when it comes to the cash he's just as guilty. Yet because Brown Sugar's better than "When Love comes to Town" we kind of let them off don't we?

Mick Jagger is famously money-oriented, and does nothing for nothing. But he doesn't set himself up as an arbiter of ethics. Bono is getting bad publicity because he spends a lot of time admonishing people and governments for not doing more to help others. Other than that, I agree with Mr. Ben.

The point is about double standards, see my first post.


I know a fair bit about offshore tax structures too Mr B, but the point is not the nature of their tax structure, but the principle that as soon as they no longer benefit from the artists tax exemption, we see them trying to avoid their home country responsibilities.


Having benefitted from the exemption for so many years you would think they would be winning to pay their bit now, but no, apparently not.


They cultivate image of being chartiable but charity begins at home and in these times of great difficulty for the people of Ireland I find their reluctance to pay their way astonishing. Noone is blaming U2 for Irelands financials woes - I don't know where you got that from.

An oldie but a goldie.


Mick - I was clearly exaggerating on him taking the blame for Ireland. My point is that despite being a twat and dabbling in politics he's a soft, lazy target when there are other more worthy ones out there (if that's their beef).


And as Art Uncuts argument is about rightful financial contributions (and not who is the biggest knobhead) I just don't see how the Stones are any better. Surely they'd also be worthy of equal wrath?


As anyone who's been will know, each Glasto needs a public villain to fuel the fires of the right on massive. It's either Jay-Z, George Bush or anyone who pees in the stream. They'll all still get off their tits and enjoy it all the same.

Glastonbury festival goers protesting? What are they going to do, refuse to pay by credit card? Ignore the official phone app? Snub the ?15 t-shirts? or really let them have it and flash mob the 'recycling team'?


This must not be allowed - next thing you know there'll be picnic rage at Glyndebourne and sit-ins at the Proms.

back on subjet, the alchemists of inoffensive Rawk lite use the same tax set up in the Netherlands as Trafigura.


Trafigura just dumps its toxic shite in West Africa, U2 shovel their rancid shite on a global level and then proceed to lecture on the evils of global capital.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...