Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think women who are intimidated are femenist or hate women. If their partner don't come to a conclusion for too

long, then something is not right. She or them may think are wasting their time I would say the world Macho

that only guys can do what they want but women no. The woman has only read the topics, and does it, they don't have time for intimidating the public, this is unnecessary. becouse Women who truly love their partners are faithfull, loyal, and more

why the would choose to do something else unless love is not there anymore. Most people when they have bad experience

are worry about their relashionships and probably they don't get married again.

Some women like to get to know their partners first before being committed again to a new partner or have sex and that means not interested in money but loyalty, and love.

Two things together can bring happiness becouse if you have a lot of in commom sharing interests, qualities, etc then for sure they can work together and succeed.

If not what is the point being together for too long. Instead of that I would campaign for freedom to achieve goals.

You can do it alone or in group everything in life is posible. Why ! No

Eh? What?


"the definition of feminism has recently broadened somewhat and can now include celebrating the misogynist male invention of "slut""


"...the male invention of slut"


"...the male invention of slut"


I think we can agree that means that she thinks 'males' 'invented' the word 'slut' can't we? What other meaning could that sentence possibly have?


I didn't mention any personal views, just that anyone with a prediliction for making crap up isn't worth listening to.


And whilst I don't disagree with the madonna/whore concept in principle, it doesn't take away from the fact that it is women who predominantly use the word slut, they use it against other women, and consequently are more than likely to have a hand in the generation and consolidation of the term.


I genuinely cannot understand how any other interpretation could be drawn, unless women were quite happy to ignore all the evidence when laying responsibility for all evils incorrectly at the feet of the opposite gender.

Incidentally whilst the madonna/whore concept highlights (somewhat disparagingly) the vicissitudes of men in their approach to women, women aren't exactly consistent in their approach to men.


Hunter one minute, farmer the next; psychotherapist today and chest thumping pounding paramour tomorrow.

Hi !Huguenot

about you topic; hunter one minute,hunter two minutes, farmer here farmer there. M, M,

I will have a read the whole campaign again as I am going in circles.

Just to mention if someone wants to go to Clayton Rd behind the Rye

doesn't exits, and I call a few numbers they don't exist either or they

are wrong numbers. 6 moths 3hours 5 minutes and 2 seconds.

Haha, yes Hughie, to be fair, I can see how you ask the question. I actually read it as the concept of slut, which probably says more about me than it does about you.


And you're right again, women want all kinds of things from a man. But I'm yet to meet a woman who actually thinks less of a man because he deigned to sleep with her.

DonkyOne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


More information found in some libraries not so much about sex but other things that can help

to clarify the full history. So many around you need to find out which library would have the

book you are looking for.

In one of the Guardian comment areas there was a rather amusing tale.


I was well dressed that day as a friend (who was in the trade) got me in for free to an expensive club when on a trip to London. Inside I was mobbed by 6 young women. I was so shocked by the attention (I have a form that only a mother could love) that I asked my friend why they were doing this. He said: "Because they think you are a City worker".


It's always nice to find out that women and men can be equally shallow.

In terms of the Madonna/Whore dichotomy etc etc - Annabel Chong engaged in her high profile gang-bang (251 acts with about 70 men in 10 hours) for the express purpose of challenging the notion that a woman did not have the right to be sexually voracious without being roundly condemned. Ironically, as would be predicted by Hugeonot's earlier posts, many of the most vicious attacks and condemnations of 'sluttery' came from women not from men who seemed to be much more blasse and accepting about it.


The reaction from many women, frankly, was as if Chong had just debased the currency.

Damian, I think there was widespread concern among women that the stunt was in fact a grotesque film of self-harm that had come on the back of earlier sexual abuse. There were serious concerns about the state her mental health. The lack of precautions taken (no use of condoms / sexual health testing of the participants) and her comment that she likes to be treated like a piece of meat, and talking about the pain involved are probably pretty instrumental in women's not taking a positive view of this as some affirmative piece of empowerment theatre. It blatantly wasn't.


And of course the men were blase, 251 of them fucked her. But would any of those men have married or made her their girlfriend subsequently? There's the dichotomy.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course they wouldn't, she's obviously a bloody

> loon.


Well yes. Evidentemente. My point was precisely that, though it didn't stop the men having sex with her.


Personally I prefer to have sex with people I actually like.

Well I guess there's a Darwinian imperative that inclines ladies to pursue quality over quantity, and men to pursue quantity over quality.


Annabel Chong's story was a very sad one - having left the relatively low crime and somewhat conservative environs of Singapore she travelled to London to study. The combination of newfound freedoms, a degree of teenage rebellion and an inappropriately trusting personality (for London anyway) left her gang-raped in an alley and dumped in a rubbish cupboard.


I don't think most people wanted to know about that regarding 251. In context this was a tragic reflection of someone who's lost their footing and is probably trying to work out what it's all about.


However, I agree with some of the posters that it was mostly women who abused her for it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's a disgusting slur against an innocent driver who was probably just on their way to drop off freshly-baked muffins at an orphanage when they had to swerve out of the way of a so-called "cyclist", and anyway traffic lights are just a Marxist conspiracy by Southwark Council to slow traffic down and force people out of cars, so we're all better off without it.
    • Frothy coffee? Not really my bag. A double espresso and a Marlboro Red? It's the breakfast of champions. The only dark drink with a creamy head which should ever be drunk by a man of my age is Guinness. I've also become lactose intolerant recently, meaning I get very impatient around milk. You make a fair point, but those legal channels are available for them to recover their repair, and legal, costs and, as I said: "It's up to them if they [Southwark] want to do that, of course." There's three or four grands worth of Cat N write-off, wrapped round a post there (more, if it's broken down for parts) causing problems. If they can't be arsed sorting that, I'm not holding my breath. Even Southwark couldn't screw their numbers up enough to make shifting the post back through circa 15 degrees more than a couple of grand, so there's a drink in it for everyone. It's a bit 'leany' just now, yeah, but I haven't noticed anyone having to limbo under it to get to Superdrugs. Or, they could make a feature of it. Pisa has made a fortune out of not sorting the underpinnings of their tower. Let's say it's an installation by someone called, I don't know, Bangsy, and it's a physical reminder that SE22 cannot deny its proximity to Peckham, Camberwell & Brixton. It's about the only thing that would get me back into The Bishop since the many dark afternoons of the soul I spent with Clarence*, the world's most depressed Weimaraner. *RIP big fella. You were always a great listener.   Come on Spartacus, don't be shy. You know exactly where the Green Cross Code Man was in 1973: less than a hundred yards away, on North Cross Road. https://youtu.be/C-XwVVMiCO4?si=rt8kQllev0t1Lgdi For some years, I found it quite difficult to go into The Forrester's after many long afternoons of the soul with Dave Prowse* (The Green Cross Code Man). *RIP big fella. You were always a great listener.  
    • Loving the arm chair speculation on here  Blimey how long before this gets spun out to be a drug dealer welding a sawn off whilst driving away from a smash and grab at the coop cash machine flipped his car and landed on a bollard type post  Where's the green cross code man when you need him ? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...