Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Heidi, what you've basically posted there are blogs. I suspect social services had rather more to go on. Yes the experts all agree (as would any sane person), that taking a child from it's mother because she won't wean it, is absolutely wrong, and if this organisation is indeed trying to do that, then urgent investigation is needed. HOWEVER, what you seem to be ignoring, is the fact that there may be far more serious issues in this case. I've never worked in Spanish social services, but I can promise you, social services in the uk do not take kids from parents without very very good cause. I suspect Spain is much the same.

In fact the doctor quoted there is the one who described the breastfeeding regime as chaotic. She obviously feels bad that her findings have contributed to the situation and is speaking out, but she obviously doesn't have all the information to hand.

http://www.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/Separada/hija/darle/pecho/elpepusoc/20110608elpepusoc_9/Tes


And neither do I so I'm inclined not to prejudge the situation. There's a judicial investigation to ensure things have been done right.

http://www.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/fiscalia/pide/juez/informe/medico/psicosocial/Habiba/elpepusoc/20110620elpepusoc_10/Tes


Mistakes do occur and when children are removed from a parent it better be for very very good reasons (and ideally should be placed with family, but I guess as she's Moroccan she may not have any support network in the country) but then noone wants a Baby P to happen through inaction do they.


Damned if you do....

It's breastfeeding awareness week. Here is an interesting case with a breastfeeding angle (albeit other possible angles too), concerning a cross-border dispute (the mother is not-Spanish) involving a European country... and WHERE IS the BBC? Can we get some REAL news on this case?


From their own webpage, the BBC thinks it's more important to report on Galliano's trial and 50-Cent's new book.


Here is the link I found on the BBC site to request that they investigate impartially. I am including Habiba's name and a link to this thread on the EDF in my message. I hope you will too.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/newsid_4030000/newsid_4032600/4032695.stm

I suspect that the BBC is not disinterested in the case, but is taking an editorial view that there are too many unknowns to make any report meaningful - so any report they can legally publish would add nothing to the known facts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect that the BBC is not disinterested in the

> case, but is taking an editorial view that there

> are too many unknowns to make any report

> meaningful - so any report they can legally

> publish would add nothing to the known facts



They're a news agency, a large news agency, a large powerful news agency, a well-funded large powerful news agency. They certainly have the resources and the ability to investigate, if they think people are interested.

In all fairness these family issues happen all day every day all over the place. The only difference is that a social media campaign has sprung up in this case. 3,000 members does not a BBC news story make, though the fact that it's made the papers in Spain and forced a judicial review might be.

The case has gone public in Spain. What would be stopping them from publishing?


Perhaps family issues should be more frequently reported, home or abroad. The fact that family issues happen frequently and are not reported, does not make this case any less worthy. Indeed, as I pointed out previously, this is Breastfeeding Awareness Week, so there is already a news angle built into this story.

Very few details have been published in spain though. it's mostly opinion pieces to be fair. the only concrete news is that the Madrid body in question think the mum's a bit of a nutter, the breastfeeding consultant seems to regret the 'chaotic' conclusion she came to and a judicial review has been ordered.


So it seems to me that the only thing that makes this different than the thousands of such cases daily that don't make the beeb is that someone latched on to it and a social media campaign has started. If it's of interest to bloggers and forum commentators then that's great and clearly the coverage is large in the non mainstream media.


But perhaps the beeb are waiting to see if anything interesting comes out of it and in the meantime is spending their reduced correspondent budget on things like renewed violence in Northern Ireland, Cameron's coalition on action in Libya dissolving and the immenent collapse of the Greek economy ;-)

You may jest but it'd get a huge amount more exposure than some byline in the dark recesses of the bbc news website where it'd get slightly fewer hits than a story about a new roundabout in the isle of man.


If it's any consolation as a Spaniard myself (from Majadahonda, the Madrid suburb in question funnily enough) I read the Spanish press quite a bit and none of it gets reported here. Even the recent elections where the Socialists were massively punished by the electorate didn't even make it beyond p93!

I sincerely hope it is "fab news". So, if it all goes wrong will there be a similar petition against the return of a child to a reported "violent" situation. Sadly very few stories can sensibly give us both sides to these types of situations.

When I read the link from the original post I must admit that I was sceptical that the entire story was being told as it was quite obvious that they only published report excerpts that support the petition cause, however I decided to sign the petition anyway for the following reasons:


1. Regardless of other evidence that may have been in the report, breastfeeding on demand, baby-led weaning, and co-sleeping should not have been cited in a medical report as evidence of a mother's incompetance. This in itself needs to be addressed even if there were other issues at play.

2. Due legal process was not followed (admittedly, I took this on faith as presented in the article)

3. Unless there was imminent danger to the child, removing a breatfeeding child without proper weaning must have been extremely traumatic to the child.


I'm glad to hear the child was returned to her mother - and I hope that if the mother is involved in an abusive relationship or has real mental health issues that social services there monitor the situation and intervene to protect both mother and child.

-A

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
    • this doesn't mean anything - it's a word salad with no reference to the topic at hand. And given the video I posted it's notable that you didn't reference it at all. The subject is the proliferation of weird intimidating Flag wavers....    As for me, I didn't vote Labour at last election, nor will I in next election (if I lived in a Labour/Tory/Reform marginal, that might be different)
    • Her legacy will be the Deputy leader/Housing Secretary who was the Labour party's sleaze crime fighter who broke the ministerial code for not paying enough stamp duty on one of her houses. As Housing Secretary she probably should have known better.    I wonder if she will defect to Corbyn where she will no doubt be welcomed with open arms and the words: "You did nothing wrong, it was all a media conspiracy comrade......"
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...