Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We would deffo use this station more if access were better. I used to go there with Little Saff in the sling, but she's getting a bit heavy for my bad back now (14 kg and 89 cm tall at just 17 months!). Mr Saff once went out in the buggy only to forget about monumental stairs. He had to bump Little Saff in her buggy up and down the stairs from the far side of the station. Oh dear!.

Thanks, ClareC. I didn't know that about Denmark Hill. Obviously not a station I have used recently. I seem to recall that North Dulwich station isn't great either, but Herne Hill is not too bad for buggies. Does anyone know who uses them frequently?


Brockley station is stepfree for trains coming south from London Bridge, but not northbound to London Bridge. The station is under some renovations, so perhaps they will amend the northbound platform in the future?


Ladywell station is stepfree both directions. It's also adjacent to lovely Ladywell Fields which has two excellent play areas for toddlers and older children.

Ummm...


To accommodate the additional East London Line services, and to provide disabled access to all platforms of the station, substantial works are required at the station. A planning application was submitted to Bromley Council in February 2009, which will include alterations to the Victorian booking hall building, removal of the current ticket office, removal of the pedestrian bridge over Platforms 1 and 2 and new stairs to Platform 1. The original entrance and ticket hall will be brought back into use, with three lifts installed to provide access to the platforms and a new canopy will be installed over platforms 3-7.


So, for over two years a project has been underway to substantially renovate a Grade II historic building. Patience people.


So that petition is worthless since it's happening anyway. And that's not a criticism of Otta or whoever else has signed it but just to alert you to the fact that it'll amount to a hill of beans.


As for the other stations mentioned, the same problems apply. Often old or listed buildings with limited space that would cost extortionate amounts of money to refurb with disabled access (which is essentially what you'd need for buggies too). This cost would have to passed on to the passengers who are already paying hefty fares. Not to mention the inconvenience caused by the work.


I'm afraid, given that the vast number of train users are non-buggy/able bodied and at peak hours, the economics don't add up.

I think the legal standpoint is that reasonable efforts have to be made. But, for example, there are some older tube stations that it is just not possible to retro-fit lifts or wheelchair friendly escalators.


And obviously considerations have to be made for Crystal Palace being a listed building - you can't just knock it down however you feel like.


I suspect, given that planning permission has been approved, money is the factor here for Southern Trains.

The law is a bit hazy around disability access. I think in order to not put small businesses out of business, they accepted "reasonable effort" (such as a shop keeper coming outside and tking an order from a wheelchair user, if the chair can't get in to the shop itself. However, when it comes to a large company, I think there would be less sympathy.


Unfortunately though, the legislation can be interpretted in different wys.

CP has trains to London Bridge, Victoria and the Ginger line, surely someone should think soon about the passengers around CP... a lot of them are parents with kids and some with disabilities, but my gut feel this may not be anytime soon, I did sign the petition though, you never know!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...