Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We would deffo use this station more if access were better. I used to go there with Little Saff in the sling, but she's getting a bit heavy for my bad back now (14 kg and 89 cm tall at just 17 months!). Mr Saff once went out in the buggy only to forget about monumental stairs. He had to bump Little Saff in her buggy up and down the stairs from the far side of the station. Oh dear!.

Thanks, ClareC. I didn't know that about Denmark Hill. Obviously not a station I have used recently. I seem to recall that North Dulwich station isn't great either, but Herne Hill is not too bad for buggies. Does anyone know who uses them frequently?


Brockley station is stepfree for trains coming south from London Bridge, but not northbound to London Bridge. The station is under some renovations, so perhaps they will amend the northbound platform in the future?


Ladywell station is stepfree both directions. It's also adjacent to lovely Ladywell Fields which has two excellent play areas for toddlers and older children.

Ummm...


To accommodate the additional East London Line services, and to provide disabled access to all platforms of the station, substantial works are required at the station. A planning application was submitted to Bromley Council in February 2009, which will include alterations to the Victorian booking hall building, removal of the current ticket office, removal of the pedestrian bridge over Platforms 1 and 2 and new stairs to Platform 1. The original entrance and ticket hall will be brought back into use, with three lifts installed to provide access to the platforms and a new canopy will be installed over platforms 3-7.


So, for over two years a project has been underway to substantially renovate a Grade II historic building. Patience people.


So that petition is worthless since it's happening anyway. And that's not a criticism of Otta or whoever else has signed it but just to alert you to the fact that it'll amount to a hill of beans.


As for the other stations mentioned, the same problems apply. Often old or listed buildings with limited space that would cost extortionate amounts of money to refurb with disabled access (which is essentially what you'd need for buggies too). This cost would have to passed on to the passengers who are already paying hefty fares. Not to mention the inconvenience caused by the work.


I'm afraid, given that the vast number of train users are non-buggy/able bodied and at peak hours, the economics don't add up.

I think the legal standpoint is that reasonable efforts have to be made. But, for example, there are some older tube stations that it is just not possible to retro-fit lifts or wheelchair friendly escalators.


And obviously considerations have to be made for Crystal Palace being a listed building - you can't just knock it down however you feel like.


I suspect, given that planning permission has been approved, money is the factor here for Southern Trains.

The law is a bit hazy around disability access. I think in order to not put small businesses out of business, they accepted "reasonable effort" (such as a shop keeper coming outside and tking an order from a wheelchair user, if the chair can't get in to the shop itself. However, when it comes to a large company, I think there would be less sympathy.


Unfortunately though, the legislation can be interpretted in different wys.

CP has trains to London Bridge, Victoria and the Ginger line, surely someone should think soon about the passengers around CP... a lot of them are parents with kids and some with disabilities, but my gut feel this may not be anytime soon, I did sign the petition though, you never know!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...