Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Trying out views you may not hold? Useful to know.


This was a technique taught to Alexander the Great by Aristotle (his one time tutor). It is a typical technique of the Athenian schools and hones debating skills - it is also the skill deployed by barristers in the UK - who can argue a client's innocence even if they believe (but crucially not know) the contrary. I'm not sure a forum is the best place to exercise such a skill, but it's certainly a useful one to have (if you can argue the other side you may also understand the other side better).

I think you're meant to take an interest into what is going on in a protective sense but not make a big show out of that interest in front of others.


You can pop in with other excuses to check someones all right. Older people are sensitive about there independence sometimes.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Agreed. But it is the nature of online forums.

> Some people are just incapable of civil

> conversation.



Like that post of yours which was recently deleted by admin, you mean? But not before several people had read it and one suggested you might like to reconsider it in the cold light of day.


Some people are indeed incapable at times of civil conversation .....

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't start again Sue. You were rude, called out

> on it and then posted insane crap and deserved the

> response you got. Take responsibilty for your own

> sarcasm and tone. You seem to get into fracas

> quite easily.



Those who saw the posts before they were deleted can make up their own mind.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My god there are some nosey sods in this world.

> Let?s hope whatever happened, the person is safe

> and being treated in hospital. Not that we need to

> know, it really isn?t anyone else?s business.

>

> Some awful people in this world, honestly.

>

> Louisa.


Couldn't agree more.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I understand that she also has numerous motoring offenses,  Oh wait a second that was someone else https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y4558r5gko] Sadly a cross bencher so can't blame Starmer for this.   Here's a former Tory minister https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65696003
    • Not so fast @malumbu. This is not a nothing to see here moment (and for some of us on the forum it is local as her house is in Dulwich)- the BBC explain why, have a read: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgkvd3jg2no Southwark's role in this will be key - did they alert her, will they fine her (as they have done with other private landlords), was it someone in Southwark who leaked it? This government came in on a ticket of integrity and this type of thing is very damaging to that message - especially in light of other similar issues Starmer's front-bench has had - it cannot be one rule for them and one rule for us. @Dulwichway you know you're in political trouble when videos like that appear within hours of a story breaking.....and goes viral. 
    • The limit is supposed to be 25 per day.  Have you made that amount today? 
    • 🤣 Well, I can apparently  "react" provided I take up a whole other post to do it. I wonder when "today" ends, and what is my daily quota of "reactions"?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...