Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think the main point MNH was trying to make is that Coulson, when he was in public office, was required to report any received income from other sources under the Special Adviser's code of conduct to avoid any conflict of interest issues. This omission raises questions about Coulson's integrity and activities.


Andy Coulson's payout: a problem for the Tories?

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...

Big mistake, in my opinion, of including the charge of illegally accessing the voicemail of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler against Rebecca Brooks and Andy Coulson.


There's enough evidence to convict them of wrong doing without this charge, that, given it's emotive nature and the Guardian's incorrect facts, may see them get off.


It would be ironic if the Guardian's misrepresentation regarding deleting of emails allowed two Murdoch kingpins to walk away Scot free.

  • 3 months later...
  • 9 months later...

speaking of free press and hacking


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/19/david-miranda-schedule7-danger-reporters


interesting developments no?


It also appears that the global press is interested but most other British papers strangely muted


(also posted in a thread I thought was active but now headlined "closed")

The DV level of security clearance checks bank accounts and requires changes reported I think.


So the security officer would have asked for an explanation.



Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the main point MNH was trying to make is

> that Coulson, when he was in public office, was

> required to report any received income from other

> sources under the Special Adviser's code of

> conduct to avoid any conflict of interest issues.

> This omission raises questions about Coulson's

> integrity and activities.

>

> Andy Coulson's payout: a problem for the Tories?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The descriptors are  Woman 30s Black There is no point in describing clothes as they change.  If it was a white woman, descriptors should include hair colour, eye colour. While sex or race on their own are not helpful, the three descriptors do not warrant the OP to be labelled racist (and why not sexist or ageist while you're at it???). Sometimes, facts are just that.  We know that there is an increase due to financial circumstances, organised crime and mental health. The real issue is the observation of the temerity and lack of consequence.  Grow up.
    • The original post was about one shoplifter. Nobody is suggesting that  the shoplifter wasn't totally in the wrong, or that there may be issues with what shop staff and  security guards can or can't do in this and similar situations. However a description of a woman which includes only skin colour and perceived age is problematic in my view.
    • Looking for a loveseat in good condition. Please get in touch if you’re selling one. Thank you!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...