Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When I spoke to work in Spring regarding returning to work part time my boss informally mentioned there had been a 1% pay increase this year (bemoaning the small %). When I got my confirmation of return to work letter it had my old salary (pro rata) on it with no % increase. I queried this by email and a couple of weeks later was informed the rise was discretionary and not all staff had benefitted from it. However, yesterday some of my colleagues were sitting around complaining about inflation and the pathetic 1% pay rise. I said something about it being discretionery and they looked at me as if I was talking rubbish.

Admittedly I am slightly sensitive being back at work and trying to get used to balancing a job and feeling like I have to prove my family life is not impinging on my work, but I do have the sense I have been discriminated against - for frankly the sake of a couple of quid.

My boss is very defensive and unable to deal with confrontation. I don't know what to do but I think if there was an across the board payrise that they should have to abide by the law which according to CAB extends to all employees on maternity leave.

Any advice very gratefully appreciated.

I would speak to your HR department and tell them your boss had mentioned a 1% payrise but that this has not been reflected in your pay recently. An HR team will be accutely aware of any discrimination that maybe implied from you being on maternity leave and not getting the rise as everyone else has (assuming everyone else has) and therefore will be quick to put out any fires by investigating. Though 1% is a small amount it sounds like you are a bit miffed on principle rather than anything else - and I totally understand and reckon you should stand up for yourself!


I work in HR and in our company pay rises this year were discretionary based on performance but everyone on mat leave got a rise as they hadn't performed badly due to their very absence from work. Same should apply to you.


If you don't have an HR dept and you need to speak to your boss I would just frame the question in practical terms i.e. you are now a mum, even though the 1% is a small amount you were counting on it to help pay for childcare etc, is there a problem with payroll as to why you haven't seen the rise. S/he can't get defensive about that.


God it makes me really cross! Though sounds less like discrimination and more like a poor line manager to me...

Good practice is to give people on ML an average increase, ie average across the company. It is direct discrimination and therefore illegal not to consider you for a pay rise, but lots of companies do that - mine tried. If they say they considered you but didn't give you a raise you are entitled to ask why, and "because you were on ML" is also an unacceptable and discriminatory reason.


Companies rely on women being too nervous & guilty on return from ML or not knowing their rights, and lots of people get underpaid as a result.


Best of luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets!
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...