Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When I spoke to work in Spring regarding returning to work part time my boss informally mentioned there had been a 1% pay increase this year (bemoaning the small %). When I got my confirmation of return to work letter it had my old salary (pro rata) on it with no % increase. I queried this by email and a couple of weeks later was informed the rise was discretionary and not all staff had benefitted from it. However, yesterday some of my colleagues were sitting around complaining about inflation and the pathetic 1% pay rise. I said something about it being discretionery and they looked at me as if I was talking rubbish.

Admittedly I am slightly sensitive being back at work and trying to get used to balancing a job and feeling like I have to prove my family life is not impinging on my work, but I do have the sense I have been discriminated against - for frankly the sake of a couple of quid.

My boss is very defensive and unable to deal with confrontation. I don't know what to do but I think if there was an across the board payrise that they should have to abide by the law which according to CAB extends to all employees on maternity leave.

Any advice very gratefully appreciated.

I would speak to your HR department and tell them your boss had mentioned a 1% payrise but that this has not been reflected in your pay recently. An HR team will be accutely aware of any discrimination that maybe implied from you being on maternity leave and not getting the rise as everyone else has (assuming everyone else has) and therefore will be quick to put out any fires by investigating. Though 1% is a small amount it sounds like you are a bit miffed on principle rather than anything else - and I totally understand and reckon you should stand up for yourself!


I work in HR and in our company pay rises this year were discretionary based on performance but everyone on mat leave got a rise as they hadn't performed badly due to their very absence from work. Same should apply to you.


If you don't have an HR dept and you need to speak to your boss I would just frame the question in practical terms i.e. you are now a mum, even though the 1% is a small amount you were counting on it to help pay for childcare etc, is there a problem with payroll as to why you haven't seen the rise. S/he can't get defensive about that.


God it makes me really cross! Though sounds less like discrimination and more like a poor line manager to me...

Good practice is to give people on ML an average increase, ie average across the company. It is direct discrimination and therefore illegal not to consider you for a pay rise, but lots of companies do that - mine tried. If they say they considered you but didn't give you a raise you are entitled to ask why, and "because you were on ML" is also an unacceptable and discriminatory reason.


Companies rely on women being too nervous & guilty on return from ML or not knowing their rights, and lots of people get underpaid as a result.


Best of luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...