Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Louisa Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > YES I was invited by StraferJack

> > > to the drinks on various occasions, and as he

> > > would testify I?m sure, extenuating

> > circumstances

> > > prevented me from attending.

> > >

> >

> >

> > So your point is ..... ??

> >

> > The drinks were open to anybody, you didn't

> need

> > to be invited. Unless we are talking about some

> > more selective forum drinks than the ones which

> > were posted up on here and changed pubs from

> month

> > to month?

>

> My point is, you talk as though not attending

> forum drinks or publicly displaying your real life

> self on a internet forum is somehow strange? I

> would have thought most people would be dubious

> about doing that, it?s not a points scoring thing.

> If you choose to do that, all power to you. I

> choose not to, and your point is?

>




Sorry, you've lost me.


Fine if you don't want people to know who you are, though personally I think it's nice to know who people posting on here are off the forum, as it's a local forum, but then what point were you making in saying you were invited to the forum drinks, if you didn't actually go?


Wading through treacle time again :))


Are we having "a good argument", by the way? :)

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Louisa Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > >

> > > YES I was invited by StraferJack

> > > > to the drinks on various occasions, and as

> he

> > > > would testify I?m sure, extenuating

> > > circumstances

> > > > prevented me from attending.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > So your point is ..... ??

> > >

> > > The drinks were open to anybody, you didn't

> > need

> > > to be invited. Unless we are talking about

> some

> > > more selective forum drinks than the ones

> which

> > > were posted up on here and changed pubs from

> > month

> > > to month?

> >

> > My point is, you talk as though not attending

> > forum drinks or publicly displaying your real

> life

> > self on a internet forum is somehow strange? I

> > would have thought most people would be dubious

> > about doing that, it?s not a points scoring

> thing.

> > If you choose to do that, all power to you. I

> > choose not to, and your point is?

> >

>

>

>

> Sorry, you've lost me.

>

> Fine if you don't want people to know who you are,

> though personally I think it's nice to know who

> people posting on here are off the forum, as it's

> a local forum, but then what point were you making

> in saying you were invited to the forum drinks, if

> you didn't actually go?

>

> Wading through treacle time again :))

>

> Are we having "a good argument", by the way? :)


I didn?t go for good reason, as I?ve alresdy explained Sue. Perhaps you should take the time to message StraferJack Who will explain the reasons why, if you are really that interested? I personally, don?t see why it?s even relevant to this discussion, but fine.


I am not having any sort of argument, I don?t do the passive aggressive thing like so many on here seem to enjoy doing. I?m more than happy to have a perfectly illogical rant in my own time *sarcasm alert*


Sorry for yet another slow response btw, you?re just too quick for me, I can?t reply at that rate! I?m just too busy doing other stuff.


Louisa.

Ladies! I enjoy the posts both of you make, and unlike some people don't think I have a right to try to act as an unofficial admin (who do a grand job without the need for us to pitch in), but you are going round in circles a bit now! Have a nice weekend, both!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That all seems really poor. How could there be two different publicised dates for the consultation? Hopefully not deliberate 🙄
    • No, it doesn't. It's a lot of work and the library is a shagged out heritage building. You admit that you don't even know the scope of the work. It's not refitting a corner shop over the Xmas holidays.
    • The published planning application proposal summary runs: "25/AP/1010  Installation of air source heat pumps; acoustic screening; pipework and trunking; replacement of radiators with air conditioning units; secondary glazing; replacement of non-original lantern roof; internal refurbishment including decoration, new fittings, toilets, kitchenettes, and remedial works to building fabric." https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=SU76HIKBJGS00 The officer's assessment includes mention of an external buggy store, which sounds a good idea if it's for use by visiting tots.  I remember one morning when I found the ground floor part-occupied by buggies, even in a few book bays.  🙂
    • Its good to hear concern for this amazing resource. If you ever visit you will find it full of Dulwich teenagers upstairs studying for exams, community is so vital for that generation. I am sure we dont want that to evaporate entirely. There is not much left. With all knowledge of the huge wealth that exists in the area, it would be so warm and rewarding for some of that to be passed to Dulwich library. The ground floor loos were returning to a state of nature itself. Moss was starting to grow.   X
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...