Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Louisa Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > YES I was invited by StraferJack

> > > to the drinks on various occasions, and as he

> > > would testify I?m sure, extenuating

> > circumstances

> > > prevented me from attending.

> > >

> >

> >

> > So your point is ..... ??

> >

> > The drinks were open to anybody, you didn't

> need

> > to be invited. Unless we are talking about some

> > more selective forum drinks than the ones which

> > were posted up on here and changed pubs from

> month

> > to month?

>

> My point is, you talk as though not attending

> forum drinks or publicly displaying your real life

> self on a internet forum is somehow strange? I

> would have thought most people would be dubious

> about doing that, it?s not a points scoring thing.

> If you choose to do that, all power to you. I

> choose not to, and your point is?

>




Sorry, you've lost me.


Fine if you don't want people to know who you are, though personally I think it's nice to know who people posting on here are off the forum, as it's a local forum, but then what point were you making in saying you were invited to the forum drinks, if you didn't actually go?


Wading through treacle time again :))


Are we having "a good argument", by the way? :)

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Louisa Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > >

> > > YES I was invited by StraferJack

> > > > to the drinks on various occasions, and as

> he

> > > > would testify I?m sure, extenuating

> > > circumstances

> > > > prevented me from attending.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > So your point is ..... ??

> > >

> > > The drinks were open to anybody, you didn't

> > need

> > > to be invited. Unless we are talking about

> some

> > > more selective forum drinks than the ones

> which

> > > were posted up on here and changed pubs from

> > month

> > > to month?

> >

> > My point is, you talk as though not attending

> > forum drinks or publicly displaying your real

> life

> > self on a internet forum is somehow strange? I

> > would have thought most people would be dubious

> > about doing that, it?s not a points scoring

> thing.

> > If you choose to do that, all power to you. I

> > choose not to, and your point is?

> >

>

>

>

> Sorry, you've lost me.

>

> Fine if you don't want people to know who you are,

> though personally I think it's nice to know who

> people posting on here are off the forum, as it's

> a local forum, but then what point were you making

> in saying you were invited to the forum drinks, if

> you didn't actually go?

>

> Wading through treacle time again :))

>

> Are we having "a good argument", by the way? :)


I didn?t go for good reason, as I?ve alresdy explained Sue. Perhaps you should take the time to message StraferJack Who will explain the reasons why, if you are really that interested? I personally, don?t see why it?s even relevant to this discussion, but fine.


I am not having any sort of argument, I don?t do the passive aggressive thing like so many on here seem to enjoy doing. I?m more than happy to have a perfectly illogical rant in my own time *sarcasm alert*


Sorry for yet another slow response btw, you?re just too quick for me, I can?t reply at that rate! I?m just too busy doing other stuff.


Louisa.

Ladies! I enjoy the posts both of you make, and unlike some people don't think I have a right to try to act as an unofficial admin (who do a grand job without the need for us to pitch in), but you are going round in circles a bit now! Have a nice weekend, both!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The link below has further information suggesting that the shop demolition and square redevelopment is funded separately from the station upgrades, so will go ahead:   https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/peckham-rye-stations-step-free-upgrade-has-been-put-on-hold-82360/ 
    • Last time the toilets were out of operation in the station M&S we were all told to go out and up to Sainsbo! Certainly didn't close (I'm not suggesting that's the thing the library should do!)
    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...