Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've no idea who's running this place but it must have guaranteed tenants from DSS/Prison Service because it can't get any walk-up business. I think there have been problems in the past but I don't know the fully story. Sorry I can't be more helpful c2p2.

Adam999 - I can't access the review in Google maps that you mention but I'm struggling to believe this is a genuine review (could be wrong though).


The reason why: if anyone needed a hotel in ED they'd presumably search online for one if none had been recommended personally. This place doesn't show up in a search. Alternatively, if you simply happened to walk past it looking for a place to stay, you'd probably not bother as it really doesn't seem like a hotel and there's no visible 'reception' either. So that makes me wonder where the 'reviewer' actually went in order to have 'noticed the dirt and the smell' as they claim.


I don't think it is a hotel, possibly its a hostel and as far as I am aware has never caused any problems (unless you count surprise from passers-by when they spot the 'hotel' sign outside its less than salubrious exterior).

Last week I saw a women photoing the 'hotel' very self counsciously I suspect a new arrival wants it run out of town so as not to frighten the property prices. Many years ago when I first moved here it was a ramshackle asian shop piled high with stuff such as heaters and lamps and the like and never felt the need to ever visit it.

michaelwalsh1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've no idea who's running this place but it must

> have guaranteed tenants from DSS/Prison Service

> because it can't get any walk-up business. I think

> there have been problems in the past but I don't

> know the fully story. Sorry I can't be more

> helpful c2p2.


Michael - out of interest, why do you think there have been problems in the past? And welcome to EDF.

a couple of years ago it was on the market after the shop part closed - if you know the number look it up on nethhouseprices - it serves a purpose - provides cheap accom for those on dss - or maybe some will think http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-to-rent/property-34350323.html would provide a better standard of living and a more righteous moan
This was orginally a hostel for those coming from abroad, a builder friend many years ago was asked by the landlord to inspect the rooms. He found they were very small and poorly converted. The landlord was expecting that 2 - 3 people could live in what was a single room. The landlord, who owns several properties in ED around Upland and Hindmans Road area is now elderly and disabled - so that is why I imagine it is up for sale. Years ago it was a shop and an 'importers business'

ibilly99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Last week I saw a women photoing the 'hotel' very

> self counsciously I suspect a new arrival wants it

> run out of town so as not to frighten the property

> prices.


xxxxxxx


I photographed it a while back because I am taking photos of various places in ED, maybe it was me you saw.


I have been here 20 years and I can assure you I don't want it run out of town :)


I think it adds character to the area :)

I just realised what has changed about this place recently ish? It never used to have a hotel sign at all then it had a sign outside on the pavement in front, rather less noticeable. But it now has a much larger sign outside on the front above the windows.


I have seen quite a few people taking photos of the sign but have never spotted the infamous man with parrot on Uplands Rd yet B)

Re. Katie1997 message:


This is the link to the review on the East Dulwich Hotel - no idea if it's authentic but seems credible.


http://maps.google.co.uk/maps/place?q=East+Dulwich+Bed+%26+Breakfast,+26-30+Upland+Road,+London+SE22+9EF&hl=en&cid=9242002885905744224


I think some estate agents are struggling to shift property near to the hotel so that might explain the plans to 'run it out of town'.

  • 2 months later...
I walk past the 'East Dulwich Hotel' a few times a day. It never used to have a sign up just a hand scribbled note stuck to gate or board saying 'rooms' but now has a proper sign up saying 'East Dulwich Hotel'! I was very surprised to see this as it still looks as seedy & dirty as ever, the paper note is still stuck to the board outside. I have seen inside on many occasion when the door's been left wide open & it does look very manky, not the sort of place you'd want to cross the threshold let alone stay in. I googled it out of curiosity & found not surprisingly ,amongst others, 3 x 1 star reviews on Trip Advisor.co.uk
It will be Mr Malik's old place.It was alleged he had places all over South lnodon which owed Council Tax. It was also alleged that This Particular property WAS pretty skanky and over crowded and failed a fire inspection If true I hope it has been improved.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...