Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Interesting, the old look at your teeth argument.


I suppose you have tried biting through the hide of a cow, or crushing bones with them?


Nope. Our teeth arent meant for hunting or killing animals. Yes we have eaten flesh in the past, and it has helped us to get where we are. However, for the human population to continue living on this earth (reachin 9 billion by 2050) it is a simple fact we will need to reduce our consumption of animal products.


Vegans use 1/4 of the land, water and oil compared to omnivores. Lets all get righteous and maybe our grandkids will have an earth to live on aswell?

I have always assumed that is was the preperation of the human diet rather than it's contents that gave homo sapiens an advantage.


Fire opened up a whole new protein group of grains and pulses into our daily feast, meat was readily available to our ancestors in its raw form prior to that and that didn't seem to give us an evolutionary leg up.


Just had a look at my teeth. Nothing like a tiger or shark (carnivore), a lot more like a gorilla's (primarily vegan).

:))

beef Wrote:

-----------------------------------------------------

> Just had a look at my teeth. Nothing like a tiger

> or shark (carnivore), a lot more like a gorilla's

> (primarily vegan).

> :))

I thought incisives were designed to cut and tear flesh...am I wrong? and if I am why don't cows have them?

by the way gorillas do eat meat, not often but they do.

Hi Heinz,


Sorry, cattle do have 6 incisors, as do other herbivorous animals such as horses. The incisors are used to shear/tear through plant and fibrous material, and therefore can also be used to tear through flesh. Your canines are used to hold the food in place (therefore they are pointy) and molars grind it down.


A meagre 3% of a gorilla's daily intake is made of insects and catterpillars, a daily hazzard when you are chomping your way through 18 kg of veg a day. As they have an organic diet they don't have the pesticides to keep the critters away. I'd say a 97% herbivorous diet was pretty much vegan to me (especially as they shun dairy).


Back to my original supposition; I don't think it is what we eat that has led to our species advancement, but how we eat. Cooking has given us the ability to extract greater energy from our food, preservation through salt and pickling has given our food a greater longevity (and helped prevent the seasonal plenty/famine), and of course farming has given us a plentiful harvest that we can share as a group.

Hi Rosie,


Chimps are mainly herbivores and will choose fruit above all other foods, gorilla and chimpanzee teeth are very similar, though in both cases their canine teeth are more pronounced than ours. I don't believe teeth really have helped out in our evolutionary progress


Cattle also have canine teeth Heinz.


Binary star, gorillas also have a similar age for puberty among females, and in parts of Africa a similar life expectancy (barely 32 in Swaziland according to the CIA World Factbook, which is shocking). So I don't really see how this helped.


And DJKQ, is this the CATASTROPHE you were alluding to?

:))


Saffron Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A few years ago when the number of clinically

> obese people offically surpassed the number of

> starving people, I suggested that we simple feed

> the fat people to the starving people...

DJ, it's true we are overdue a mass extinction event by some millions of years, but the timescales of we're due one soon are pretty huge, I wouldn't hit despair or start building that deep bunker just yet.

You might want to think about signing up your great grand kids for the first near light speed deep space exploration vessels though!

beef, I don't really think this has any bearing on the argument, but chimps do eat meat. "mainly herbivores" means omnivores, right?


They are predators of certain other mammals, in particular the red colobus monkey, and have been known to eat other chimps after a battle. Meat has been shown to be important in denoting status within the group, and apparently in getting them sex (I'm going to make no comparisons to the attractiveness of a man who eats a bloody steak and one who eats sodding lentils).


Like I say, has no bearing on this particular argument - but claiming they're "mainly herbivores" when some of them eat up to a ton of meat annually is a little disingenuous.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...