Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm working in an accounts dept. in a family owned business. I don't have a permanent position though. While covering for a colleague who was on paternity leave I discovered proof with 99.99% certainty that he has stolen cash from the company. What I found may just be the thin end of the wedge. The guy also has a very strong motive as he is helping to support a partner who is the mother of his child but who lives several hours out of London. The MD appears to think the sun shines out of his bottom.


I'm probably leaving this place in a month.Should I report what I know?

I don't think you've got any choice but to highlight it.


I would be very wary of accusing anyone - but I would feel quite happy in asking for someone's help in trying to help you resolve an inconsistency in the acccounts.


This isn't just an issue of right or wrong, but also self-preservation. If someone can embezzle funds, they'll also be prepared to let someone else carry the can for it: what better target than the temp?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm working in an accounts dept. in a family owned

> business. I don't have a permanent position

> though. While covering for a colleague who was on

> paternity leave I discovered proof with 99.99%

> certainty that he has stolen cash from the

> company. What I found may just be the thin end of

> the wedge. The guy also has a very strong motive

> as he is helping to support a partner who is the

> mother of his child but who lives several hours

> out of London. The MD appears to think the sun

> shines out of his bottom.

>

> I'm probably leaving this place in a month.Should

> I report what I know?



Yes without f-in doubt.


It's theft & it could one day cripple the owners business.


Don't expect a pat on the back though



BUT it is the right thing to do.



NETTE(6)

Speaking from experience I wouldnt. Families can be a bit weird.If it is a family run business and they are related and the boss thinks the sun shines out of his backside,he may know about it and even be in on it. Families may stick together and it may backfire on you so Id say keep out of it, as an outsider it has nothing to do with you.

SpaghettiSue40 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Karter he could but it might be a case of shoot

> the messenger and they could make life hard for

> him until he leaves. This happened to me some

> years ago and it wasnt worth the stress.


That's why i say point out the discrepancy, not grass the person up and explain motive. Capisci Spaghetti?

I'd definitely raise it but stick to the financial facts. The books don't balance, explain why and let them ask who is responsible. You can present a view on that but then it's up to the owner to decide if they believe you and how they want to handle it. They employ you to manage their accounts, so I think part of that responsibility is to inform them of theft or fraud. You don't want to find them subjected to an audit down the line and for it to find that you never informed them at the time.


I had a similar experience when I took over at my TA. I did an audit of the accounts (because I could see something was wrong just from the annual financial statements). I put together a report and immediately took it to the people who needed to know. It was absolutely the right thing to do but of course those that were implicated have an absolute hatred for what I did (but who cares about them).

Ah right.


Well I reckon that if you're working in the accounts department, it's pretty safe to say that he has responsibility for accounts rather than swimming pools - and that includes never knowingly letting an erroneus set of accounts pass his desk unaddressed.


Could see him in trouble.


Cross-post

Alan, I would get all your concerns down in writing as clearly as possible and let the boss know as soon as you can. What they do with that information is up to them, but at least you will have discharged your duty and covered your back.


I had an ex-colleague try to pass off a pretty serious mistake and large overcharge she had made onto me in a place I worked in the past. Luckily I had written my concerns about her actions in an email to my boss before she tried to blame it on me and the client involved confirmed it was her not me, but it could have been very messy.


You have no choice but to make sure you don't leave yourself open to criminal or professional charges by someone who may be desperate to push the blame onto someone else.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Disclaimer, some of the later  SMB stuff is insipid but I like this.  I
    • I'm pleased to have gone onto a meter as it has saved us money.  When first fitted we found there was a leak and TW replaced the old lead pipe with plastic (we had to pay the last few metres into the house but some geezer did this at a fair price). No doubt others have positive experiences too.   Otherwise I'm no fan of the private utilities but that shouldn't colour our opinions.  
    • I recall that when the meter was installed it it was not set at zero. Presumably it had come from elsewhere or was a recon one.    Same here. I phoned TW today to ask if there was a meter at our property (even though I knew there was) and I was told quite categorically that there was not and that our bill was calculated on RV value When I asked why we used to get our meter readings shown online in our account, It they could not provide an explanation. Our RV value according to TW is 547 which equated to a 4-5 bedroom property with a large garden. With just two of us living here then our consumption must be well below the expected volume. Given the facts, I am totally convinced no that TW have an algorithm that hides the actual meter readings when the actual consumption is below the RV based consumption suggesting they are a bunch of shameless rogues!!  
    • Let me get this straight . The OP  was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation?  You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong.  What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he?  And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness  "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...