Jump to content

Recommended Posts

May I for a moment interrupt you all as you call one another stupid? I feel no need to get involved in that particular debate as I tend to agree with everyone on it.


Getting back to that nice graph that Huguenot posted. I?m no history expert but isn?t the significant and prolonged fall in national debt from the early 50s until the 70s over the period when the country was investing most heavily in building and growing the Welfare State, that most heinous of the left wing horrors that has blighted this good country over the last 100 years?


Coincidentally there do seem to be some nice big spiky bits when we were fighting wars. Wars are great because they aren?t all lefty and shit. We get to be tough and sensible and all the machinery, flag waving and death makes us feel like we very big willies indeed.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?m no history expert but isn?t the

> significant and prolonged fall in national debt

> from the early 50s until the 70s over the period

> when the country was investing most heavily in

> building and growing the Welfare State, that most

> heinous of the left wing horrors that has blighted

> this good country over the last 100 years?


But for most of the time "From the early 50s until the 70s" we had Conservative governments. Spending on the Welfare State has risen under all governments since the War. You can argue whether that's good or bad, but the real differences between the two parties in this respect have been small.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah I see so debt can only dealt with by committed

> and sustained investment in public services and

> infrastructure carried out by a right wing

> government.


No, that doesn't follow, alas. There are lots of other factors that affect debt apart from welfare spending - tax rates, rates of economic growth, non-welfare spending etc.

It is certainly true for the last two governments that one cut investment and then other tried to make up for it - Education and the NHS being good examples. In reality what should have happened is that one should have invested more than it did so that the other would need to invest less. Those are the kind of swings that we see in normal times between the two main UK parties, but one is a needed reaction to the other. Two extremes always trying to cancel each other out.

"Two extremes"


I'd be hard pressed to call the differences between new labour and the tories 'extremes' ;)


In practice they are politically millimetres apart though the rhetoric aimed at appeasing traditional support whilst in reality selling themselves to the vast majority straddling the centre ground differs slightly in tone.

PLus the right=warmonger thing is also a bit of a myth, I think left wing governments go to war more often, maybe it's a hint of that 'we are at war with Eurasia, we have always etc' mentality. Blair certainly was partial to a good things exploding episode (though I guess see earlier points about him not really being left wing in the slightest)

Typical lefty arrogance. I suppose now you are suggesting that it is all some sort of nonsense, much as you think of everything else in the world no doubt, created by the simple to simplify things?


We have a system of categorisation which works so pick a side so that people know what to think of you.


Next you will be suggesting that the human brain works as it does by sorting things into categories and that our entire cognitive functioning and perception of ourselves and the world is due to a billion, billion little presumed categorisations and that consequently we really need to think about how we think before we think about using thinking to come to things like ?opinions?.


That type of rubbish will never a discriminating man make.


Your suggestions are that of a dissident who is at best petulant and at worst a threat to the system we have worked so hard to achieve.

There is currently a big difference between certain elements of each party on whether it would be better to target inflation and take the medicine, plunging the country into recession OR whether to keep interest rates low and qe high in the hope that this maintains employment levels. Economics v social considerations I suppose but the divide is not necessarily Tory/ labour.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Chains moving in is a sure sign that LL is heading for a fall. They are parasites, waiting for the independents to be successful and then, in partnership with rapacious landlords, they move in and force out those very businesses who have created the market they then seek to exploit. They replace a lively diversity with a bland and predictable offering. Then, when a downturn arrives, they move out, leaving boarded up premises and charity shops. Independent businesses who have worked hard to make a success of their efforts will try to see out hard times as they’ve invested so much. Chains look only at the bottom line and think nothing of closing branches. Chains are liable also to expand too fast, be managed badly and then collapse. Think of Brick House being forced out by Gail’s, the closure of White Stuff (although that chain was replaced by another) and JoJo Maman Bebe. . Sadly, I fear that will be the future of LL. 
    • It’s the impact the festival has on the community, the people living next door to the park who have to endure the thumping music and worse. Then there’s the park and the state it’s left in and the wildlife, especially nesting birds. All the roads going down Denmark Hill towards the park were closed off and roads off half moon lane and going up towards West Norwood closed off with wardens at each end, who were paid by Lambeth Council to stand there for the 4 days.  The festival made the news channels and interviews suggested most of the people attending weren’t fron the local area but places like Ireland and Scotland.  I live a 20 minute walk from the park and could hear the thumping music all day and night. Also the wind certainly carried the smell of drugs to my garden! For 4 days I couldn’t believe how strong it was. 
    • Emirates Stadium is  >60,00 but they tend to be very quiet 🙂 Jokes aside though, it's a case in point. Highbury was <40,000 and was 300M up the road, so there are definitely Islington residents who used to live half a mile from a fairly big football stadium, and now live right by a massive one. One that holds rock/pop concerts too accomodating 70,000 fans whether they like ot or not.   40% of Islington households are in social housing so regardless of when they moved their current homes, they may have had little say in exactly where they are housed.   
    • St Christopher's only take books in perfect condition. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...