Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I didn't say it wasn't Sean. I was simply outlining my reasons why I feel he should be under pressure considering Arsenal have not won a trophy for 5 years. His job should be under pressure now. It may make him act a bit more decisively in correcting the obvious flaws which are preventing his team from winning honours. My own view on him is that he won't be told because of his arrogance.

Hmmmm


i DO know what you are getting at jimmy. But I think he is the opposite of arrogant. He would dearly love to buy a couple of big names. But they aren't easy to procure even with all heaps o cash. But he is taking a long term financial view if arsenal which will stand us in good stead. Unlike, say, politicians, bankers or other football managers he isn't willing to spend silly money for potential short term success. He is, I think, to be applauded for this. Much as our obvious deficiencies currently hurt to witness

I agree, but he can't swim against the tide all the time. He must spend some money. He made a very astute signing with Vermaelen. He splashed a bit of cash on Arshavin. They have both been succesful. I'm being a bit provocative saying sack him, as I do rate him as a coach and anyone who promotes good football is to be applauded. Perhaps Arsenal simply don't have any money?
Good player. But he's not a target man or lone striker. He plays off a striker, like a classic number 10. Personally I think Wenger could have done a lot worse then to buy Pavyluchenko from Spurs. Him and Arshavin were superb together in the european championships.

Just stepped off the naughty step, after my two weeks of exile. Is that cheering I can hear from Sandboy, the dollar sign or whatever, Declan, and the usual holier than thou crew.


Any way, crap result against CSKA Fulham, who will win the league, Man Ure hugely flattering scoreline but when the opposition help you as much as Pompey did I guess it's to be expected, Spuds drawing at home and Liverpool back to winning ways means that they may overtake Spuds on Wednesday night if they win against the Arsenal. If circs were different I'd be happy to give the scousers the three points to ensue Del Boy Churchill Redknapp ends the season out of the top four.


The bloke who had a rant at me after I was sent for an early shower two weeks ago, namely $$$$ or ???? or whatever his ID is, made me smile. Obviously the man is a footballing oracle whose opinions and wisdom should be interpreted as being holy scripture and others like myself should bow in deference to this footballing sage. After all he supports the team that won the world cup for England in 1966 don't you know. Oh and finally, thanks to Keef for being a decent bloke and having the courage to tell most of you what he thought of you. Well played.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, welcome back we look forward to the same old

> 'stuff'


That will be two of us then eh, oh holy one. You do make me smile. I see your mob lost again. Shame for a team that won the world cup in 1966. Did you know that? Oh yeah you've told us countless times, that, and how Brooking scored a stooping header against us back in the day. Yeah same old "stuff".

Still - as your whole football argument seems to be look what we won, you can't really have a go at Man U or Chelsea or Liverpool at the mo can you? Anyway, been terrible on here without you I suspect we'll soon return to the high standard of debate that you bring to this thread, infact it's happening already.

Atila-poos



Oh naughty boy, glad you're back ( had you gone really , or just lurking in the shadows planning your re-launch )


There was a vacuum but now it's filled again *ears pop*



Oh & what's happened to our glorious Gunners, seems we have run out of steam



Puffffff....ttt



W**F

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still - as your whole football argument seems to

> be look what we won, you can't really have a go at

> Man U or Chelsea or Liverpool at the mo can you?

> Anyway, been terrible on here without you I

> suspect we'll soon return to the high standard of

> debate that you bring to this thread, infact it's

> happening already.



I'm glad you missed me and my argument has never been about lokm at what we've won, keep taking you're medication and have a lie down, try reading my posts properly. Or do you just see the red mist (very appropriate) as soon as you see my posts? You put a post on here two weeks ago in which you took the opportunity to bravely tear in to me when you knew I couldn't defend myself, so as far as I'm concerned you've made yourself fair game. So I'm glad you enjoy or little discussions. Long may they reign. As for high standard of debate< i'll leave that to you, as you are clearly a footballing sage and the only opinion on here that carries any weightor credibility. It must be great to be as good as you are eh?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bollox Attilla I took it off when your ban was

> announced and marked that on this thread. It's

> still there, go back and you'll see that that is

> the actual truth but that won't suit your agenda.

> Anyway it's happening already.


My only is agenda ia against you for being cowardly enough to put it on here when I couldn't get back at you. So you took it off AFTER the ban, how very big of you, but the damage was done. Sorry that doesn't suit your agenda. Don't you like the taste of your own medicine, finding it hard to swallow?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apologies admin. My post was in response to his

> garbage about 'guts' - I probably wouldn't have

> posted if I'd seen he'd been banned again as I

> wasn't trying to dig once he'd gone


Well, I didn't know you were banned until it had be been announced so I couldn't take it down before without some clairvoyance....


Here's what I wrote after I removed the post. So you can seethe away with false persecution if you want. As I said, personally I've found it far more pleasant on here for the last 2 weeks, my opinion only but for me that's the truth, I left school 30 years ago....

FFS - this is the football thread.


Pistols at dawn or shaking hankies at each other needs it's own thread.


Now, Mockney, what can I do to make you feel better about the New Den? Come with me on the home side and it won't seem quite so nasty. Still can't get away from the breezeblock monstrosity, but it's not so bad.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is just normal business behaviour. That's why there are so many coffee shops in ED and shops selling gifts and interiors stuff, clothes, restaurants.  If there's more than one business of a similar type then it can benefit all of them up to a saturation point and keep up quality. It's all sounding like many think Chango has made a malicious move when it actually sounds like it's owned by one guy who has a good business that has done well.   Anyway this is all great advertising for both empanada places. Very close by is the organic grocer who sells really good value and very tasty samosas and other Indian snacks which are also worth trying. 
    • Hello, Does this lovely little panther have a name? & Is he neutered & microchipped?
    • Well I don’t approve for a shop doing the same food to open so near - just wrong in my opinion. Why not go to the village, Peckham - foot fall would be great in Peckham and certainly more multi  cultural than ED. Village has money but doubt foot fall would be as good as ED.  At least they could have gone to the stretch leading up to Peckham Rye or why not bottom of Barry Road?? Or even North Cross Road I for one, on principal won’t be going in.
    • Heh yeah haven't even bothered to remove the emdash. The OP is AI slop as well.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...