Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Montenegro will be thrilled. They top the group. Only the team at the top is guaranteed a place at Euro 2012. If we can't beat a team like that we don't deserve to be in the finals of any Int. Tournament.


What angers me though is that all of these players every week play for their clubs at a much higher tempo without any trouble. Yet they play for England and the game has the pace of a rickshaw. It's almost as though they can't be bothered running. Dulwich Hamlet play at a quicker tempo than that. I just don't get it.

Good point. Premiership pace doesnt necessarily benefit you playing against organised, disciplined opposition.


I didnt think it was that bad last night. It was frustrating, Crouch should have done much better with his brace of chances. Rooney was awful then almost scored as I was screaming 'will somebody get him off the damn field'. I thought it was a great save, but the slow-mo sowed it was a pretty duff shot too.


It was just one of those nights where things just won't go your way (Man U Monaco springs to mind in the days when I supported all English teams in Europe). Two stone wall penalties not given etc. Fate really should have decreed that superb Montenegrin effort go in, so we can actually count ourselves lucky!!

When Engalnd finally wake up to the fact that they are no longer a force in International footabll, they will become far less disappointed with results such as the one from last night.


Scotland game was better to watch, but the scoreline flattered the home side. Had the Spanish been more clinical, it should have been 2 or 3 nil by half time. Anyway, a side with Darren Fletcher on the losing side is always a plus.


It looks likely that the Italians will win their game 3 nil by default after their game was abandoned due to crowd trouble, caused amostly by Serbian fans apparently.


Roll on Saturday and back to the real business of the Prem.

"When Engalnd finally wake up to the fact that they are no longer a force in International footabll"


well, yes and no. We aren't, that's clear for all to see, but that doesn't mean we can't be. Spain were the perennial under-achievers and were even worse than England for a long time, and are now the best team in the world, and I genuinely believe England can become a world force again (as long as we put most of the FA up against the world....and the Premiership execs whilst we're at it).


We've the passion for the game here, the grass roots participation and huge amounts of money in the sport.

Unfortunately we've also got huge amounts of money in the sport.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well, yes and no. We aren't that's clear for all

> to see, but that doesn't mean we can't be. I genuinely

> believe England can become a world force again (as

> long as we put most of the FA up against the

> world....and the Premiership execs whilst we're at

> it).

>

> We've the passion for the game here, the grass

> roots participation and huge amounts of money in

> the sport.

> Unfortunately we've also got huge amounts of money

> in the sport.



Unfortunately passion, and money mean nothing if the players on the pitch are pedestrian, and most of the starting 11 last night are not much above that level. Money is probably part of the problem. Many of our pampered millionaires don't really give monkeys about national football. Anyone for a bet on Terry being for for the next Prem game?


England seems to persist with a deluded notion that they have some kind of devine right to be up amongst the best and aren't. I wonder how long it will be before the enlightened pundits of Sky, BBC, ITV et al blame it on the influx of foreign players.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
    • That petition is bananas.   If you want a youth centre there pay the landlord the same rent a Londis would and build it yourself or shut the f**k up to be honest. Wasting our MPs time with this trivial nonsense is appalling. If your kids are still out at 1am on a school night you've got bigger problems than vapes and booze and hot sausage rolls. 
    • There used to be a better baker than Gail's on the same site immediately before Gail's pulled their financial muscle.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...