Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was always going to do pedantry lets face it, but Mussolini was no nazi.


He was a fascist of course and far from my cup of tea, and though he liked cracking heads and pursuing very ill thought out colonial policies (jeez, who doesn't these days) he shouldn't be smeared with the actions of the darker fascist types the other side of the alps.


Interestingly if you look at the proportion of european jewish populations sent to their deaths by country, Italy is actually the lowest (16%) because it was the least puppetty. In fact it only got bad there in the north when Mussolini was deposed and the germans installed martial law, without that its at about 3%.


For the worst countries outside Poland(91%) where the camps were and the SS could do what they liked, look no further than those lovely cuddly collaborating Dutch (71%) the baltic states and greece! (86%)


Any way I digress, as you were.

...to be fair to the dutch (fair I hope niot an excuse) it's a pretty small place with probably a pretty efficiient pre-war bureacracy that makes people's whereabouts pretty easy to find. I think the Balkans and Poland (infact eastern europe and russia as a whole) had pretty appalling anti-semitic histories prior to WW2 as well. Ironically Germany/Austria didn't really.

point taken, but it's still got a pretty big population given the size and for a beauracracy to work well that means the whole thing has to be dedicated to rubber stamping the murderous policies of a regime who has invaded and subjagated you.


That means widespread collaboration rahter than the cosy picture of resistance films like Orange Soldier like to

portray. To be fair it was probably such a successful film because they embraced the fantasy with such gusto due to the deep sense of shame at the war years.


You can borrow http://www.amazon.co.uk/Ajax-Dutch-War-Football-Europe/dp/0752842749 that more than touches upon the topic in many places, quite a cool book.


I've nothing against the Dutch, lived there for a year, nor am I a fan of Mussolini's. I am rather partial to PDC despite his rather odd opinions though.

Opening this can of eels was always likely to start a shit storm so fine, here it is.


I admire PDC's committment and passion and ability. I admire his honesty and the fact he is prepared to say he admired Musso and is dedicated to a bunch of nutters in Rome even though I think he is wrong.


He is NOT though - and never has been - a racist and has never - to my knowledge - committed an overt racist act. The infamous salute was punished and his reasons for it may seem twisted and from anyone else would definitely smack of backtracking/excusing it because we like things black or white. He said..


"I am a fascist, not a racist. I give the straight arm salute because it is a salute from a 'camerata' to 'camerati', the salute is aimed at my people. With the straight arm I don't want to incite violence and certainly not racial hatred."


So you don't like facism, who does? But your point is cheap and narrow and there have been whole dissertations written on the difference between the tribal loyalty of these so-called ultras and those committed to organising the world along lines of racial purity but that doesn't matter when it comes to scoring cheap points does it?


Terry's racism was disgusting in its casualness - why are you not protesting that this thug is going to continue to be allowed to play in English football let alone play for his country? And he is not alone - racism certainly still exists beneath the veneer of a lot of 'respectable' people in football as it does in the rest of society yet those who are good at pretending and/or are punished for the occasional slip as long as they pretend contrition and wear the sackcloth we forgive them.


I thought more of you than this kind of Daily Mail knee-jerk crowing but clearly I was wrong.

?I?m sure people will want to talk about Luis Suarez, but he accepted his ban, served his suspension and returned against Spurs on Monday,? said Dalglish.


?It?s time for all of us to draw a line under what happened.


?We have spoken to him. I know he will shake the hand of Patrice Evra and the other Manchester United players before the game.?



Suarez refuses to shake Evra's hand

HALF TIME: Manchester United 0-0 Liverpool. Controversy at the end of the half, as on the whistle, a still irate Suarez boots the ball into the stand. Evans goes up to remonstrate. The ref gets in the way and ushers the players to the tunnel. Seconds before, Dalglish was on the touchline beseeching his player to calm down. He's been anything but calm during this first half.guardian

Looks like Dalglish is trying but maybe a little too late.

jctg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't wait to see how Dalglish tries to defend

> Suarez's actions this afternoon.



Maybe he'll just be an a***hole and refuse to discuss it... oh he already has. King Kenny Canute.


ETA: After seeing UDT's clip the above can be amended to 'refused to discuss it with BBC and was only porepoared to be interviewed as long as they didn't ask him about it'.

"Suarez is a disgrace to Liverpool Football Club. He should not be allowed to play for Liverpool again. He could have caused a riot."


Perhaps not shaking his hand was wrong, but if anything was going to "cause a riot", surely it was this


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/16998363


But yes, that video of Kenny Dalglish is embarrassing.

400+ in the crowd over here in SG, which has a very strong Liverpool bias, and I think everyone wished Evra well in his celebration.


There was a lot of passionate pro-Liverpool noise before the handshakes, but when Suarez refused to proffer his hand the crowd went silent.


Big clubs like Liverpool rely heavily on worldwide support, and this episode seems to have had an extremely negative effect. The club may be obliged to find a solution to this one way or another.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well his manager said he shouldn't have, but you

> know best UDT.

>

> Agree the whole sorry saga hasn't done Liverpool

> any favours.

>

> The club and match going fans seem to be convinced

> that they're in the right though.


Alex Ferguson branded Suarez a disgrace.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...