Jump to content

Recommended Posts

All depends upon the tax decision - But it could be a case of - Footie people don't have to pay tax, do they Harry. They might get off.


I don't really care either way as the league was in the bag. ;-)


Show me the money, backed Celtic when 12 points behind. But then I back them most years.

Rangers have been deducted ten points by the Scottish Premier League after an administrator was appointed at the Court of Session.


The club will also be prevented from registering any new players until they exit administration, except in the case where an emergency goalkeeper is required.


Court proceedings in Edinburgh on Tuesday resulted in the appointment of Duff and Phelps as administrator.


Rangers? ten point deduction applies immediately and will see their tally reduced to 51, leaving them in second spot.


Ally McCoist?s side would be 14 points adrift of Celtic and nine points ahead of third placed Motherwell, who have a game in hand. Rangers have 12 SPL fixtures left to fulfil this season.


If the club are still in administration at the start of the 2012/13 season, they will start the campaign on minus ten points.


SPL rules forbid the club from registering any new players from this point forward. Rangers, if required, could appeal to the league to appoint an emergency goalkeeper, if they can prove one is required due to injury or illness.

Just got this as a text and thought it was funny.


Fergie's priorities


Kung Fu kick a fan = OK

Miss a Drugs test = OK

Sleep with your brothers wife for 8 years = OK

Sleep with Granny prostitutes = OK

Don't shake hands with one of his players = Ban them for life.


I hadn't actually thought about it, but it is a fair point really.

apart from the obvious Cantona one, the others aren't really relevant to the game tho, are they - personal matters when not representing the club.


The drugs test maybe, but feasibly an accident and he did serve his sentence


so that leaves the kung fu kick. Which I still have a sneaky regard for. But it wasn't "ok" - the club suspended him for 4 months

If Suarez had been a Utd. player we'd have been hearing about the stress 'the lad' had been under and the 'misunderstandings' that arose because of a clash of cultures and that, regarding the handshake, he missed or didn't see (also the Wenger take on this) Evra's hand as it had dipped out of vision and the lad's only human for God's sake and it's time to lay off him and give him a chance especially as he's apologised time and time again.

Back to real life dilemmas. I'm sad that Rangers have gone into receivership, but not so much that Portsmouth are struggling - it gives Milwall a breathing space. I know it's wrong to benefit from others' misfortunes - does that make me a really bad person?*



*Am i) very pissed (started at 3.30 pm - don't ask); ii) am as a result of i) feeling very depressed and fragile - answer kindly.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If Suarez had been a Utd. player we'd have been

> hearing about the stress 'the lad' had been under

> and the 'misunderstandings' that arose because of

> a clash of cultures and that, regarding the

> handshake, he missed or didn't see (also the

> Wenger take on this) Evra's hand as it had dipped

> out of vision and the lad's only human for God's

> sake and it's time to lay off him and give him a

> chance especially as he's apologised time and time

> again.


..if only

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay then, but since you've mentioned it, should

> John Terry have been punished (stripped of

> captaincy) for shagging a team mate's other half?

>

> Personal matter, when not representing his club /

> country.


It was personal, but wasn't there the added complication of the England team and dressing room morale, esp with the other Man City players???

What's interesting in light of recent events is that Wayne Bridge didn't have to apologise for not shaking Terry's hand.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If Suarez had been a Utd. player we'd have been

> > hearing about the stress 'the lad' had been

> under

> > and the 'misunderstandings' that arose because

> of

> > a clash of cultures and that, regarding the

> > handshake, he missed or didn't see (also the

> > Wenger take on this) Evra's hand as it had

> dipped

> > out of vision and the lad's only human for

> God's

> > sake and it's time to lay off him and give him

> a

> > chance especially as he's apologised time and

> time

> > again.

>

> ..if only


Exactly - I was 'quoting' what I thought Fergie would say and I think he would easily turn a late, forced apology into 'apologised time and time again'.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Back to real life dilemmas. I'm sad that Rangers

> have gone into receivership, but not so much that

> Portsmouth are struggling - it gives Milwall a

> breathing space. I know it's wrong to benefit

> from others' misfortunes - does that make me a

> really bad person?*

>

>

> *Am i) very pissed (started at 3.30 pm - don't

> ask); ii) am as a result of i) feeling very

> depressed and fragile - answer kindly.


Maybe Alex Salmond could (for the sake of Scottish Unity and in the cause of Scottish cultural strength) help bale them out with loans/tax breaks. He could make them promise never to even think of joining the Premier league and commit their future to Glasgow as a result.


And (being as kind as possible) Portsmouth will survive, and the idea that the puddy-tats would need and gratefully grab such a 'breathing space' is the kind of delightful picture that puts a smile on the face of waifs and strays everywhere.

maxxi Wrote:


>

> Maybe Alex Salmond could (for the sake of Scottish

> Unity and in the cause of Scottish cultural

> strength) help bale them out with loans/tax

> breaks. He could make them promise never to even

> think of joining the Premier league and commit

> their future to Glasgow as a result.

>


You are joking right? That bas*ard hates Rangers and the supporters more than the English!

He or his cronies in the SNP may say the right things "bad for Scottish football on a whole", "sad day" etc etc, but they'll be dancing a jig at the news.


I'm stunned. I can't quite believe it has happened so quickly and NOT as a direct result of the tax case rather that the fu*king con-man that is Craig Whyte hasn't paid taxes since he took over. ?9m is the figure owed since May.

PLUS the main tax bill relating to EBT's that could reach ?75m.


Maybe we'll come out of this stronger the other side, as long as we avoid liquidation, and take one or two seasons on the chin - we'll still be ahead of Celtic in league trophies!!!


I just hope the knock on effect isn't as wide as it could be and other clubs don't feel our demise in their pockets which they have the real potential too.


RTID.

SCSB shows signs of stress. No surprise there.


PGC shows signs of being the nice person that I'm sure she is. Class is permanent. Rangers will be back somehow. Celtic came through near collapse and I'm sure Rangers will come back too. As someone who only really started supporting Celtic when they were down and out, the slow rise to recovery is the best feeling in football.

What Glasgow Rangers fans are going through at the moment pales in comparison to what the Portsmouth fans have been through over the past few years. Still, I must say it is a very sad day for Scottish football. Where once it was a two horse race there is now only one team in it. Celtic may as well be handed the SPL on a plate now and for the next couple of seasons.

Otta, I have to accept Tevez is coming back. I may not be particularly happy but that's the world football lives in. We should have off loaded him 2 seasons ago-every transfer window he has been a prima donna.

On a lighter note and in reference to your Fergie post (sorry RD/Laddy Muck ! >:D<)


401341_10150669629529740_563084739_11257648_1702803119_n.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...