Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jah Lush Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Well played Stevenage. Horrible game,

> horrible

> > > pitch but you fully deserve your replay at

> > White

> > > Hart Lane.

>

>

> >

> > Replay sandwiched between L'Arse and Utd

> games...

>

> Then we'll just have to get on with it won't we.

>

> And yes I saw that one one as well Atila. Oh how I

> laughed but not as much as I laughed when we beat

> you at the Effeminates last season. So looking

> forward to next Sunday when we can it do all over

> again.


Brave words. But we've been laughing at the shower from shite hart lane non stop for the best part of 50 years so have your 15 minutes. Lets face it next season you'll be back to mid table mediocrity when the twitching saggy jowled crook has it away. Lets hope he doesn't leave with a nasty financial parting shot. That would be awful.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A mess??


"acting like a @#$%& since 1970" - every thread has to have its rodent problem ratty.


I should have added that due to a software error I am reading COYS' name as COYS instead of COYI which is the correct spelling.


Finally don't be confused by the OP's name. Jah Lush started this thread but changed his name by deedpoll to Jenniejenjen and will only answer to this should you ever meet him out and about.



*skulks back to 'life outside the premiership' thread*

Now that Tevez has done his Uriah Heep impersonation and offered his ever so humble apology, does anyone seriously think he'll play for City again? I think Mancini will just keep saying he's not quite match fit until the end of the season. And if he does get in the side, what signal does that send out to the likes of Balotelli who can't get a regular game? Get rid for the sake of the club.

He will play, because;


1. He's a very good player, and they may need that extra bit of quality in the final push;


2. (and this is the main reason) They will want to put him back in the window for potential buyers, and a player who has played a few games for the title winning team (possibly) will be a lot more attractive than a player who last played in September 2011.


Edit, cross post with BR

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think both guys (Macini & Tevez) recognise that

> they need to put away their personal difference in

> order to focus on winning premiership title.


I think Mancini might think that. Tevez is just doing what's best for him. He needs to play if he is to have a worthwhile career after City.

It sounds to me like it was a reconciliation brokered by the top people at City. It does not do the club any favours from a PR perspective or a financial perspective to have this dispute prolonged further. I think Mancini was told to accept Tevez back subject to a full and public apology.



I think without intervention from above Mancini and Tevez would have quite happily never spoken again. But then they don't control the club.

So Psycho thinks an under-21 qualifying game will be better for Oxlade-Chamberlain than what he calls a "ten minute cameo" with the full England side.


Anyone else think this is the same kind of plodding, backwards thinking that has dogged the national team for decades? Yes he's young etc. but he needs to play alongside his fellow future internationals asap or what's the point in these kind of friendlies?


I think the Ox should be blooded now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...