Jump to content

Recommended Posts

had to chuckle at the Spuds debacle,...nearest one to my 8-0 predictions


to be honest the Liverpool result just made me feel sick, I'm still scarred by 2006 and have never watched that game ever on TV. I didn't watch much of the second half in the Millenium, stopped staring at the ground when they put the 2 mins of Injury time board up just in time to see Liverpool pressurise us on the 'pass back# that resulted in Gerrards goal, still think it was a terrible bit of gamesmanship although only Hammers seem to have noticed it


PS I bet MickM never layed that bet on Spurs, the idiot

still think it was a terrible bit of gamesmanship although only Hammers seem to have noticed it


Yeah, funny that. Having thrown the ball to your player, what exactly would you have had Liverpool do after your player made a rubbish clearence?


Not trying to pick an argument, and would agree that Liverpool got lucky that day, and would have been absolutely gutted had I been a hammer, BUT calling foul play is just wrong.

Of course I did not lay my Spurs bet.....there is nothing worse than laying off a bet and then hoping your prediction does not happen (spurs don't win). I would not write spurs off entirely. Need someone to support anyway.


As someone who only saw the highlights ledley king was a complete passenger today.

Aaron Lennon hasn't appeared for England since his World Cup flop. I can't see why Lennon should get the nod over Walcott for an England place this season. Lennon has only scored three goals compared to Walcott's eight this season. And when was the last time Aaron has scored a goal for England?

COYS Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> North london is ours, North london is ourrrrs,

> f*ck off back to woolwich, north london is OURS!



Really? You can keep your part the Tottenham part of North London mate, you deserve it. By the way Bale is to get a nomination from the diving association of Great Britain apparently he's better at it than Tom Daley, the monkey featured Welsh twat. 2 nil and you fcuked it up. Apparently Lead Boots King doesn't train before a game. Is that right? Well you'd never have guessed it after yesterdays piss poor showing!!! B)

That is the poorest game I've ever seen Ledley King play. Normally he is superb but he didn't look fit at all. Very sad. I hope it's not the end for him. He's been a great servant to our club. As for Bale he should stick to the wing and bring back Lennon on the other side. I thought we really missed him yesterday. Can't understand why he wasn't playing.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This article says it all. Arsenal pushing for

> third place seems doable now.



Well yeah - Redknapp was right when he said "it was one of those days for us"


and Wenger spot on when he said "it would be down to consistency" but anyone could have told him that before the game.


on another note - with Rooney, Cleverly and Bent out surely Pearce has to rethink leaving the Ox in the U21s?

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > This article says it all. Arsenal pushing for

> > third place seems doable now.

>

>

> Well yeah - Redknapp was right when he said "it

> was one of those days for us"

>

> and Wenger spot on when he said "it would be down

> to consistency" but anyone could have told him

> that before the game.

>

> on another note - with Rooney, Cleverly and Bent

> out surely Pearce has to rethink leaving the Ox in

> the U21s?


Wenger simly outsmarted Redknapp. This concerns me as he needs to be more tactically aware in the international arena.



Perhaps Pearce is playing it safe for his first game in charge rather than gambling on an inexperienced O-C.


eta: he

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
    • Have you posted on Nextdoor? There's a big cat community on there. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...