Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe Red Devil can

> enlighten me on that one.


I read an article over the weekend that said Spurs hadn't beaten Utd in 21 PL games, 22 if you count todays game, so I make that 11 seasons ago, the scoreline was 3-1.

I remember very clearly Spurs' last win at OT as I went with a Spurs' supporting friend who was visiting Mcr.

We were standing in the corner of the Stretford End, yes it was that long ago, and despite telling him to keep schtum if Spurs scored, he let out a squeal of delight when Gary Lineker scored his only ever goal from outside the box...I like to think that lots of nervous throat clearing from yours truly prevented him from having his testicles 'surgically removed' and leaving OT with a permanent squeal.


Every team has a blip, I'm sure Spurs will come good and claim 3rd place, 4th place wouldn't be a disaster, just means a couple of extra preliminary CL games...

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even SAF said that talk of a manager leaving can

> be unsettling to a team. He experienced that. I

> suppose you know better though Parkdrive.



My experience is nowhere near as as in depth as yours seems to be professor.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even SAF said that talk of a manager leaving can

> be unsettling to a team. He experienced that. I

> suppose you know better though Parkdrive.



And the fact that the purple nosed one is infamous for his mind games, and that this might yet another example of same didn't occur to you no?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh bugger! Thought Spurs played quite well today

> and then Man U get three chances and stick them

> all away. That's football. I can't remember the

> last time we beat Man Utd. Maybe Red Devil can

> enlighten me on that one. I knew we'd lose today

> by the way.

>

> PS: I've never ever ever seen an Arsenal player

> dive or cheat in anyway whatsoever. They are so

> honest those Gooners. They are beyond reproach.

> And Arsene Wenger's eyesight is the best in the

> world and he's never ever been known to winge.

> EVER!


For an hour you WERE the better team, but you did an Arsenal, played the better football and got beaten. Thanks for the compliment re our boys. For all of the EDFers that have taken to exception to my my dig at Bale and Suarez, can you honestly tell me you've not had similar digs at players that performed in the same way against your sides. Hypocritical, you lot? Never.

I hate to say it, especially as a supporter of a lower profile club myself, but the main reason one doesn't think 'diver' for Osman, or 'divers' for everton is because people don't really think about Osman or Everton.

Everton doesn't get scrutinised in the same way as Chelsea, Man U et al so it isn't talking point enough to get those dubious sobriquets.


We get things like plucky because we're underdogs. You may not like it but when most people hear 'everton' they think 'liverpool's second team'.

Sorry :-/

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hate to say it, especially as a supporter of a

> lower profile club myself, but the main reason one

> doesn't think 'diver' for Osman, or 'divers' for

> everton is because people don't really think about

> Osman or Everton.

> Everton doesn't get scrutinised in the same way as

> Chelsea, Man U et al so it isn't talking point

> enough to get those dubious sobriquets.

>

> We get things like plucky because we're underdogs.

> You may not like it but when most people hear

> 'everton' they think 'liverpool's second team'.

> Sorry :-/



Absolutely spot on. I couldn't make that point because it would have been taken as a dig, but it's basically true.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pablogrande Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Viera dive

>

>

> Get a grip man, he hasn't kick a ball for us since

> he won the 2005 FA cup for us. Get up to date eh?


Yeah, get a grip pablo, don't you know only Parkdrive is allowed to cite ancient evidence...


Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Parkdrive Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> >

> > > Not sure about fans of other clubs but I'd

> > rather

> > > none of our players took part in a futile,

> > > meaningless friendly in case of injury. Not

> the

> > > greatest idea to play such a game between

> > normal

> > > league games. Utterly pointless.

> >

> > Perhaps, tomorrow's game England - Holland game

> > was originally scheduled for last summer but

> was

> > postsponed because of the riots. Anyway PD

> nothing

> > to worry about. It's not as if Arsenal

> contribute

> > much to the England side in recent years.

>

>

> Really? Seaman, Dixon, Keown, Adams, Walcott,

> Wright, Wishere,how recent we talking? And as for

> Holland RVP? Perhaps give a definition of "recent"

> before making sweeping and ludicrous statements

> eh? Club v Country? The Arsenal every day of the

> week.

I whole-heartedly agree with you El Pibe regarding scrutiny. With the increased scrutiny for the higher profile cubs comes a counter-balance, they get more favourable decisions from referees. Thus, as fan of a lower profile club, I will lose no sleep over pointing the finger at serial cheats, Suarez for example.

> I hate to say it, especially as a supporter of a

> lower profile club myself, but the main reason one

> doesn't think 'diver' for Osman, or 'divers' for

> everton is because people don't really think about

> Osman or Everton.

> Everton doesn't get scrutinised in the same way as

> Chelsea, Man U et al so it isn't talking point

> enough to get those dubious sobriquets.

>

> We get things like plucky because we're underdogs.

> You may not like it but when most people hear

> 'everton' they think 'liverpool's second team'.

> Sorry :-/



Absolutely spot on. I couldn't make that point because it would have been taken as a dig, but it's basically true.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ''My Dad is bigger than your Dad, na na na na

> na

> > nah...''

>

>

> Oh the irony



Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Hypocritical, you lot? Never.


Indeed...

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Even SAF said that talk of a manager leaving

> can

> > be unsettling to a team. He experienced that. I

> > suppose you know better though Parkdrive.

>

>

> And the fact that the purple nosed one is infamous

> for his mind games, and that this might yet

> another example of same didn't occur to you no?


I'm sure your sentence is equally valid Parkdrive (as a sentence) without the 'no' at the end. It's content is another thing though.SAF spoke about this effect years ago when he witnessed it firsthand.

Dunno, but don't think it would necessarily be a bad thing. England can't lose, because they have no chance of winning really, so a caretaker coach can go with low expectation and see what happens.


By the way, why does the BBC website continue to give a platform for Terry Butcher to spout his out dated drivel?

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are we really heading for the euros with a

> temporary manager in place.......did I just hear

> right on the radio?


Pearcey is probably the only one with experience in getting an England team to the final. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/jun/29/england-under-21s

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...