Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick won't like this.......


FORMER Barcelona star Bernd Schuster has criticised Celtic for their tactics in the 2-1 Champions League defeat at the Nou Camp on Tuesday night and claimed the Hoops do not deserve to be in the competition.


The former West Germany midfielder, who also played for and managed Real Madrid , accused Neil Lennon's men of being too negative in their Group G clash with the Catalan giants which ended in defeat when Jordi Alba scored an injury-time goal for the home side.


Celtic were widely praised for their display but Schuster was quoted in the Scottish Sun as saying: "I'm fed up of seeing these type of matches.


"There should not be teams like Celtic in the Champions League.


"We saw it last year with Chelsea. It was a very bad example for football and it is regrettable that they became European champions.


"You see Celtic defending with 10 men and almost snatching a point - that is not fair.


"I believe the coach of Celtic viewed many times the video of Chelsea last season against Barcelona.


"He decided to repeat the system, but the ultra-defensive system is not football.


"Chelsea have now generated a school for teams like Celtic to study. It would have been unjust if a team that defended with 10 men had taken one point in the home of the best club in the world.


"UEFA needs to change this phase of the competition if they want to breathe life into the Champions League.


"Celtic do not merit their place if they are going to play in this style."

So the Hearts.. Turns out they were looking at signing an ex player who was a free agent and now can't because of the embargo. The player has just signed for Dundee United.

Who was part of the decision making team on the embargo for Hearts??.... The Dundee United chairman!!!

Conflict???

Celtic losing 2-0 to Kilmarnock. Easy Jet lag maybe.

As for Schuster...

"It's just the ramblings of someone who has failed as a coach," Lennon raged on BBC Sport. "I don't take too much notice of Bernd Schuster.


"I am more into the thoughts of Gordon Strachan, Martin O'Neill and the Alex Ferguson's of this world, who I would take advice from before anyone else. I am disappointed that the media here wanted to emphasise his thoughts on the game."


Schuster was similarly critical of Chelsea's tactics in their Champions League final win in May, but Lennon insists he did not set out to appear so defensive.


"I was sitting there 60 minutes into the game thinking 'God, what is Bernd Schuster thinking of our performance here, I better change it'," Lennon added sarcastically.


"I did go with two strikers and I did bring on James Forrest and Kris Commons.


"I didn't set out to be defensive, but sometimes Barcelona can get a grip of the opposition and not let go."

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ...as an aside, happy that I am there's a fair

> few

> > of us on here, I'm still a bit surprised that

> the

> > EDF Football Focus has more Irons regulars (EP,

> > Maxxi, Rhinestone, 'bout now and me) than any

> > others (Arsenal gets a bit close)...we must

> like

> > it down here in bandit country :)

>

> Glory hunters...


Now that IS funny!

I can't abide clattenburg


But I was happy to see the bookings for diving today (as I was gervinio booked for arsenal for same)


More of that please. Yes there was some contact with Torres. Yes the rules says as long as there is some contact it's not a simulation


But it was. So book em. All of em

You idealist you, can't agree. You'd have to change the rules and then that change would make it absolutely impossible for referres, contact=not a dive IS clear. Some terrible offside decisions this weekend benefitting Arseanal, Man U and Everton. At least the Hammers were taken apart fair and square!

Offside is a different argument tho ( and I agree with your weekend conclusion)


But not idealist


1) clamp down in game

2) retrospective video decisions



Everyone knows a dive when they see it. Everyone hates it. Relatively easy problem to solve. It really really is

If you get contact and go down that has to be *fair* although maybe not ideal, seriously in many cases how do you differentiate between a contact drive and going down involuntary? Can of worms, worse than now. I WOULD retrospectively have players banned for clear non contact dives I agree.


Clattenburg has 24% of the Red Cards in the Premiership this season, the man is a joke.

" Everyone knows a dive when they see it."



I dunno about this. I have seen players go down and be accused of diving after replays show only minimal contact. What they never seem to mention is the pace of the man who goes down whilst running at full tilt. I think sometimes nominal contact is enough to throw off a player at full pace.

"" Everyone knows a dive when they see it." "


fair enough - sligtly too broad a brush there, but the thrust remains the same. your point about the pace of modern footballers is valid but too many players are aware of this and use it as a smokescreen


At the top level I really can't see any argument against technology for these big decisions


In the meantime, if enough doubt is introduced into cheaters minds by a sustained wave of cards then the net result should be broadly positive


(Torres should have gone anyway for his first yellow IMO - and even with the second and the "slight" touch he clearly put on a show.)

You can't have technology live in the game for this , that'd would inevitably lead to every near or in the box tackle going to the third referee/technology and would kill the flow of a game. What you CAN do, easily, is retrospectively punish players for clear dives, say with a 3v match ban that would quickly cut it out. Contact is contact, Torres was fouled.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Nothing to do with the tories overspending whatsoever eh! Blame the last 10/11 years of blatant mismanagement, incompetence and willful deceit on the poor bastards that were left with the fall out of a complete car crash tory government.   One PM after another falling on their sword. Open corruption and piss taking throughout covid and a legacy of huge debt and destruction yet in your view it will be labour's 4 years in power that bankrupts us in 2029.  Another one that must think people are blind and stupid.  Rejoice rejoice. It's a pity he and his fellow clowns were completely annihilated at the ballot box. I mean they were doing so well after all 🙃🙃
    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...