Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not sure of implication of this tweet but sounds

> interesting

>

> "Chelsea race case against Clattenburg in jeopardy

> as club brings in lawyers to conduct internal

> investigation. Mail tmrw+online"

>

> From Neil Ashton


Definitely interesting. And if they back down its a complete Buck up.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Good summing up from the Guardian.



More questions should be asked, surely, if they decide not to pursue the matter. That, however, is not completely out of the question, believe it or not, and it is slightly disconcerting to hear from within Stamford Bridge that the club have not yet fully decided whether to proceed. Having come so far, they surely have to. And if not? The FA then has to launch a separate investigation into why.


The FA's disciplinary commission criticised Chelsea because of the "evolving" nature of Cole's submissions for Terry's hearing, heavily implicating the club secretary, David Barnard, because of "materially defective" evidence. The accused are now the accusers and, much like Clattenburg, cannot afford to get this one wrong.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Coquelin and giroud threw their shirts into crowd.

> Had to be told about extra time. Heh



To be fair, I thought at 4 -4 a replay was on the cards. Isn't that what used to happen in this competition?

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I find it strange that people are saying that

> if

> > Clattenburg was guilty his career would be

> over.

> > Why doesn't that apply to footballers?

> Personally

> > I'm all for second chances and rehabilitation

> > after a suitable punishment is served. As well

> as

> > banning/fining players, the FA should insist on

> > racial awareness community and educative work

> as

> > part of any punishment...

>

>

> ABsolutely no way RD. he's a referee not a player.

> Any controversial decision against a black

> player??????


When I wrote my post, exactly the same point you made came to mind. But I feel the referee would know he would be under so much sccrutiny that he would soon get found out if he was showing any bias, and then rightly thrown out of the game. Fans will always come out of with their conspiracy theories, let's not bend to them...

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

As ???? is busy I've offered to check and update scores...table to follow


Weekend 20-21 Oct...


???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dine these after a few beers so edit if neccessary

>

>

> RD 2 correct scores 4 correct results= 10 Points

> (Applause)

> Jah 2 correct scores 3 correct results= 9 points

> Rhinestone 1 correct score 6 correct results=9

> points

> MickM 1 correct score 6 correct results=9 points

> SCSB 1 correct score 5 correct results=8 points

> Lady g 1 correct score 4 correct result=7 points

> Otta 1 correct score 4 correct results=7 points

> Alan M 1 correct score 3 correct results=6 points

> Dave R 1 correct score 3 correct result=6 points

> ???? 1 correct score 3 correct result=6 points

> Parkdrive 5 correct scores = 5 points

> Maxxi5 correct scores= 5 points



JL - 4 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 10 pts

RC - 4 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 10 pts


MM - 6 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 9 pts


RD - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts

SC - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts


LG - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

OT - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts


?? - 3 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 6 pts

AM - 3 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 6 pts


Mx - 5 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 5 pts

PD - 5 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 5 pts


DR - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Weekend 27-28 Oct...



???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Scores on the doors this week - please check

> someone!

>

> Mr Lush 3 correct scores, 4 correct results - 13

> points (new best weekly score methinks?) open the

> champers!

> Otta 3 correct scores, 3 correct results - 12

> points

> RD 2 correct scores 5 correct results - 11 points

> (mr Consistency)

> Parkdrive 2 correct scres 3 correct results - 9

> points

> Lady G 2 correct scores, 2 correct results - 8

> points

> Mick 1 correct score, 5 correct results - 8

> points

> Alan M 1 correct score, 5 correct results - 8

> points

> SCSB 1 correct scores, 4 correct results - 7

> points

> Rhinestone 1 correct score, 4 correct results - 7

> points

> ???? 1 correct score, 4 correct results - 7

> points

> Maxxi 0 correct scores, 5 correct results - 5

> points

>

> It's not like the Hammers to be propping up the

> table :)

>

> I'll update the overall table Probably after next

> weekend as I'm short on time plus plase check your

> own and let me know if I am wron.... I've done

> these quickly



JL - 4 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 13 pts


RD - 5 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 11 pts


OT - 4 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 10 pts


MM - 6 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 9 pts

PD - 3 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 9 pts


?? - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts

AM - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts

LG - 2 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 8 pts

RC - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts


SC - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts


Mx - 5 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 5 pts

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

Hmm, other problems with that. It would be important not to disincentivise engagement after an injury absence.


Being a statistical moron, I'm wondering whether the fairest result would be to multiply the average score by the percentage of weeks played?


As in played 6 weeks from 7 for an average score of 7 would result in a score of 6?

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

After the last couple of days a maybe a foray into the FA cup (from 3rd round?)?


Based on a knockout system with bottom two dropping out of each round up to the semi when (if the 11 above were all that entered there would be 3 left by then so 1 would drop out leavng 2 to contest final)?


What do you mean some people's only chance of rescuing their season is a good cup run?!?? B)


COYI

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Here you go RC, every Hammer fan deserves their day in the sun...


Most Long Balls Played So Far This Season:


WEST HAM - 308

Reading - 255

Everton - 252

Southampton - 252

West Brom - 240

Aston Villa - 224

NewCastle - 213

Stoke - 209

Norwich - 208

Fulham - 202

QPR - 190

Spurs - 184

Chelsea - 161

Wigan - 154

Sunderland - 153

Arsenal - 151

Man city - 137

Man utd - 135

Liverpool - 118

Swansea - 114

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • NewWave
      Up date on Viet Flavour

      By NewWave · Posted

      was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • Lord Pencilton
      4+ Assessment Advice for Parents

      By Lord Pencilton · Posted

      It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • kiera
      GALA 2026

      By kiera · Posted

      Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • Azalea
      Fireworks

      By Azalea · Posted

      So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...