Jump to content

Recommended Posts

RD - I don't think one (incl moi) should get the average score for missing a week - that puts you above half of the people who could actually be bothered.


How about 2/3 or 3/4 of the average score? That would be more fair?


I realise I'm adversely affected by this suggestion, but I'm above poor Quids and he's played evey week, poor lad.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RD - I don't think one (incl moi) should get the

> average score for missing a week - that puts you

> above half of the people who could actually be

> bothered.

>

> How about 2/3 or 3/4 of the average score? That

> would be more fair?

>

> I realise I'm adversely affected by this

> suggestion, but I'm above poor Quids and he's

> played evey week, poor lad.


I know Mick, but Quids would actually finish above you because your score wouldn't be considered as you only have 60% participation.

I've done another table putting in a flat score of 5 points for missing a week.

This penalty needs to be low enough to act as an incentive not to misss a week, but not too low so as to deter latecomers into thinking they could never catch up.

Does 5 sound about right? (FYI the average of everybody's scores is 7.5)

Do people think this is a fairest system?..

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 5 sounds ok to me.


Whatever system we use, you and SCSB79 are joined at the hip, in good Old Firm style...with Rangers losing this week, is there only one more chance in Scottish Cup of an Old Firm match this season?

Erm... 5 eh?... my consistent/average score you mean?


So the equivalent of not playing, I mean the 'penalty' to be awarded would, as things stand, to all intents and purposes, at this point in time, realistically, and going forward - be called "a maxxi"?


As in:


RD - "Oooh, after a strong start Otta's not been able to play this week, so he's had to settle for a maxxi!"

OTTA - "Gutted."


I've never rarely been so insulted!


Now under Huge's system I flirted with 5th from bottom - ahh those heady days.


Intelligent bloke that.


Must be the Singapore air.


Always liked him.




*goes off to sit in corner and study cup form.

red devil Wrote:


> I've done another table putting in a flat score of

> 5 points for missing a week.

> This penalty needs to be low enough to act as an

> incentive not to misss a week, but not too low so

> as to deter latecomers into thinking they could

> never catch up.

> Does 5 sound about right? (FYI the average of

> everybody's scores is 7.5)

> Do people think this is a fairest system?..


Seems fair enough to me. We definitely needed an incentive to participate each week. Obviously there will be times when someone can't for one reason or another. Thanks for the work you've put in here. Much appreciated.

Well I'd like to add that the table should be adjusted so that the 'indigos' are at the bottom regardless of the points they have accumulated. As, in effect if they don't lose that colour they won't count anyway. And I'd move up the table in the interim.


In Argentina it is actually possible to win the league and be relegated in the same season.......but that's another story.

Awful display by the Arsenal, no heart no passion, awful. The chuminess by RVP and especially Santos towards RVP was vomit inducing. The travelling support were brilliant. Great stuff, more passion than the collective 11 on the pitch!! Brilliant game for the neautral yesterday between Liverpoll and the Toon, two stunning goals.

Strange weekend for results, Utd only top 10 team to win :)

Have to say that was the worse I've seen Arsenal play at OT for a long time. They played better in last years mauling. It would've been a similar scoreline had Utd been less wasteful.

AVB's problem is his inflexibility to change a system when it's not working, allied with dodgy substitutions. In midweek his subs handed the initiative to Norwich, and I can't understand why in a home match he would replace one striker with another when chasing the game against Wigan...I bet 'arry had a chuckle at that.

With only the Monday Night game to go, it looks like it could be a record low scoring week in the Predictor League.

Since the concensus of those who commented was to use the 5 point Maxxi for teams missing a week, we will.

From this week I'm also going to introduce the Coupon Buster Bonus. Each week I will identify the match/result that has the longest odds* that weekend, e.g. Southampton to win at Man City @ 12/1. So if someone correctly predicts an away win they will receive a 5 point bonus (this overides the normal 1 point). If the correct scoreline is predicted as well, they will receive a 10 point bonus (this overides the normal 3 points).

This weeks Coupon Buster is Sunderland to win at Everton


*Based on William Hill** odds

**Randomly chosen

I have posted a request in the "Wanted Section" but thought I would ask here too (do forgive me Admin).


From where may I buy tickets for a match at Old Trafford which is both reputable and will not leave me feeling ripped off?


I have been wanting to go to OT for over 40 years, and it looks as though this season is going to be it - so seats need to be semi-decent too! :))


Thanks in advance.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Guess it depends on what you think is a rip off. I

> think footy tickets are disgustingly over priced

> these days. Off to Anfield on the 17th for the

> first time since I left Liverpool 11 years ago,

> and can't believe the prices!



Sure, these things aren't cheap...it's the same with tickets for the threatre, the ballet, the opera etc. I am happy to pay (or at least hubby is! :)) ) the going rate as this is going to be a massive treat for me. However, I do resent the payment of an extra - say minimum ?25 - on top of the face value of each ticket. Or is ?25 an acceptable extra to pay for PL games these days? I honestly don't know. I really would appreciate some constructive advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...