Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Spanish connection is the main reason RB was appointed and Guardiola would be able to make all sorts of demands re transfers and time to reorganise if he wanted the job - that's if RA wants Chelski to play the 'beautiful game'.


He's (RA) won the trophy he wanted now so maybe he was so irked by the criticism Chelski got that he would be willing to let Pep have a couple of seasons the revolutionise things - like all billionaire megalomaniacs he wants to be loved :)


Mancini must surely be on his way whether he wins at home or not - they were miles off qualifying for the knockout stages when the Gooners did it for the 13th consecutive season - and there are no signs that Mancini is on the way to creating a CL winning team.

Meanwhile back in Rome where visiting English fans have come to expect a chivving from the locals. Lazio's Ultras are at it again. I expect nothing will be done about it and the culprits will get away with it...again.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20442906

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hope Rafa has found his marbles again, as he had

> clearly lost then towards the end of his Liverpool

> days.

>

> It's a great opportunity for him, despite

> Chelsea's bad treatment of managers, as he has not

> exactly been in demand since leaving Liverpool.

>

> Good luck to him.



er, Milan, Mick?

So I heard. Good. Hear that Mikel has a serious charge over this now.


Given the unlikely marriage between RB and Chelsea, how about the one between Neil Warnock and El Hadji Diouf? He once called him a sewer rat and has since signed him for Leeds and calls him a matador. Any others?

FA can't really win this.

I personally think it was all a diversionary tactic, but the FA will inevitably be accused of sweeping it under the carpet, whitewashing (boom boom) and hypocrisy.


Anyway, glad for CLattenburg, though he'll never hear the end of it, mud inevitably sticks.

"but the FA will inevitably be accused of sweeping it under the carpet, whitewashing (boom boom) and hypocrisy. "


Not by any significant number I don't think... I think the bulk of mistrust will be directed at the current crop of Chelsea players and whatever odd hierarchy exists there

And let's take a moment to look at that recent/current crop of Chelsea players


By even the mercenary standards of 2012 premiership standards, they take some beating don't they. I think they willed themselves to win the fekkin CL to spite managers, media, fans


If they had a supportive manager for a couple of seasons they wouldn't have roused themselves


Talented maybe, odious certainly


Do winners always have to be nice guys? No, but when you have such a concentration of egos, a concentration to surpass they brashest foxtons, then judgement is warranted

Harry wouldn't actually say he was interested on MOTD last week out of respect for Hughes. It was very clear that he was interested though.


I find Hughes really difficult to like, so quite pleased really. Agree about the timing though, very odd. Perhaps they wanted to spare him the final humiliation of a thumping at United.

It's one game they were sure to lose in any case so it might free up the players enough to 'have a go' if they'd been feeling oppressed by Sparky's tactics. Makes for a more interesting coupon buster now...?


Sunderland 2 v West Brom 2

Everton 1 v Norwich 2

Man Utd 1 v QPR 2

Stoke 0 v Fulham 2

Wigan 1 v Reading 1

Aston Villa 0 v Arsenal 2


Swansea 1 v Liverpool 2

Southampton 1 v Newcastle 1

Chelsea 2 v Man City 3

Tottenham 1 v West Ham 2

Sunderland 1 v West Brom 2

Everton 1 v Norwich 1

Man Utd 3 v QPR 3 (you never know...)

Stoke 2 v Fulham 0

Wigan 1 v Reading 1

Aston Villa 0 v Arsenal 3


Swansea 1 v Liverpool 2

Southampton 2 v Newcastle 3

Chelsea 3 v Man City 1 (Torres hatrick... Yeah right)

Tottenham 2 v West Ham 2

Sunderland 1 West Brom 1

Everton 2 Norwich 1

Man Utd 5 QPR 0

Stoke 1 Fulham 2

Wigan 2 Reading 1

Aston Villa 2 Arsenal 3


Swansea 2 Liverpool 1

Southampton 2 Newcastle 2

Chelsea 2 Man City 3

Tottenham 2 West Ham 2


I'm going to White Hart Lane on Sunday. I'd like to predict a win for Spurs but but our form is very patchy at the moment and can see the Hammers getting something out of this game. (BTW - if you're reading this Parkdrive you haven't put your predicted score in for this fixture).


As for Mark Hughes. It's been a long time coming. I guess the owners are thinking - do we trust him in the next transfer window? - He spent a lot of money and most of those signings haven't worked out and the results haven't come either. Get someone else in and see how that goes. A similar thing at Chelsea. Though they started playing the sexy football that the owner craved, they were shipping goals at the other end of the pitch. They've missed Terry at the back but Benitez will tighten things up and make them difficult to beat again. First thing I'd do is drop David Luiz. For the money they paid for him I think he's been rubbish..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...