Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Agreed RD it is good if "our" teams do well in Europe, if only this translated to the national team then I'd buy in wholeheartedly but as we know, it doesn't.


My neutrality in this competition has its limits though, I'll support anyone and I mean ANYONE playing against Chelsea.

Uefa has charged Sir Alex Ferguson for failing to attend the press conference after Manchester United were knocked out of the Champions League by Real Madrid at Old Trafford. Nani also faces proceedings due to the red card he received during the last-16 second leg. Rio Ferdinand is still waiting to hear if he has any possible sanctions to answer for his sarcastic applause of the referee Cuneyt Cakir at the end of the match.


A statement from Uefa said: "Uefa has opened disciplinary proceedings against Manchester United FC for [the] red card of player No17 Nani [and] post-match media obligations not fulfilled [under] III 2.6 and 2.7 of the competition regulations. The case will be dealt with by the Uefa Control and Disciplinary Body on Thursday 21 March."


Uefa rules state all managers must attend post-match press conferences. While Ferguson speaks to television after domestic league and cup games, the Scot refuses to be present at briefings with the print media.



Source:http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2013/mar/06/sir-alex-ferguson-nani-charged?CMP=twt_gu

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Apart from the usual suspects I'm happy to

> 'support' any English team in Europe"

>

> Would the usual suspects include Man City,

> Liverpool and Chelsea, maybe Arsenal? So you're

> happy to support any English team you don't regard

> as a rival. Big of you.


Must be something in the water today.

Football is built on and thrives on rivalries. For me a proper rivalry is historic and transcends league position, which is what you seem to be alluding to. Historically our main rivals are Liverpool, Leeds and Man City. These are the 'Usual Suspects' I was referring to.

Even though I don't see Chelsea as a rival, in recent years they've become a deeply unlikeable club and set of fans per se, so currently I have no qualms about adding them to 'the list', and not supporting them in Europe either. I think a lot of non-Chelsea fans feel exactly the same...

I hated Chelsea when they were a sh1te club with a bunch of pond life w*ankers as fans. I hate Chelsea now they are a successful club with a bunch of pond life w*nkers as fans joined by the worst sort of Premiership newbie yuppie w*nkers as fans. I wouldn't give a fook if Chelsea ceased to exist whereas I'd actually miss the pikeys at the New Den if their crap club dissapeared.

Everyone has their own pecking order regarding which teams to support in any fixture where your own team isn't involved (not even to the extent of maybe playing the winner of a particular cup-tie in the next round) - I do it so I care who wins - I don't watch footy just for a technical buzz.


They're often historical (I will ALways fucking hate Leeds and deffo wot quids said re Chelsea) and can change (I would have backed Man C over Man U in the past but nowadays notsomuch).


I do usually support any English cub in Europe - I yelled myself hoarse in a bar in Eastern Europe supporting Man U in 99 (but there were loud German businessmen everywhere so it may not have been motivated by a fondness for reds!)

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > RD, were you honestly cheering Chelsea in kast

> > years final?

>

> Nope, and I could give you lots of reasons why I

> didn't. I wasn't saying it was wrong not to

> support a fellow English team, just asking 'bout

> now why he/she wasn't...


RD I can assure you I ain't no Laydee!

Champions League Last 16, Round 3 scores...


LG - 1 Correct Result + 2 Correct Scores = 7 pts

RC - 1 Correct Result + 2 Correct Scores = 7 pts


MM - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts



JL - 3 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 3 pts

Mx - 3 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 3 pts

OT - 3 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 3 pts


AM - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts

RD - 2 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 2 pts


SC - 1 Correct Result + 0 Correct Scores = 1 pts



RC the big mover this week, probably done enough to qualify.

Meanwhile at the bottom, the League frontrunners are struggling to come to terms with the intricacies of the European game...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RC the big mover this week, probably done enough

> to qualify.

> Meanwhile at the bottom, the League frontrunners

> are struggling to come to terms with the

> intricacies of the European game...



Bugger the cups* - I topped the weekly PL standings last trip out, for the first time, and demand my sash and biscuits.



*Though doing okay in both (smug smiley)

It's a Double Bubble weekender, first off the League, Week 25 fixtures...



Saturday 9th March 2013


Norwich V Southampton

QPR V Sunderland

Reading V Aston Villa

West Brom V Swansea



Sunday 10th March 2013


Newcastle V Stoke

Liverpool V Tottenham


ETA: It was a very close call, but this week's Coupon Buster is Spurs to win at Liverpool...very tempting.

The EDF Predictor Cup 6th Round...


Just to recap, these are the head to head's...


SC v LG

OT v JL

Mx v EP

RC v RD


If both teams score the same number of points, any replayed game will act as a decider. If no replay or there is still a tie after the replay, then the most correct scores (previous rounds ignored) will decide who goes through. If it's still a tie, then the coin decides.


For the semi-final draw, the numbers 1-4 will be used, and these numbers will be allocated to the 4 players that go through, with the player scoring the most points allocated No.1 etc. Again, if a tie, correct scores or a coin will decide.



Saturday 9th March 2013


Everton V Wigan

Man City V Barnsley



Sunday 10th March 2013


Millwall V Blackburn

Man Utd V Chelsea

PL


Saturday 9th March 2013


Norwich 2 V Southampton 1

QPR 2 V Sunderland 1

Reading 2 V Aston Villa 1

West Brom 2 V Swansea 2



Sunday 10th March 2013


Newcastle 2 V Stoke 1


Hmmm, Head or heart head or heart head or heart...


Liverpool 3 V Tottenham 2 (HEART)



CUP

Saturday 9th March 2013


Everton 2 V Wigan 0

Man City 3 V Barnsley 1



Sunday 10th March 2013


Millwall 2 V Blackburn 1

Man Utd 1 V Chelsea 2

Just to recap, these are the head to head's...


SC v LG

OT v JL

Mx v EP

RC v RD


I can't believe the EDF'ers who have made it through. Just goes to show that the big teams are not interested in the Cup anymore. Personally I fielded a lot of youngsters in the early rounds and it backfired, Benitezstyle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...